On 1/17/2014 5:04 PM, Rik Kabel wrote:
On 2014-01-17 06:22, Hans Hagen wrote:
no, side effect of substantial optimizations (where i simply couldn't
test everything ... you're probably the only user building accents)
Hans
It is needed to create what might otherwise be LATIN SMALL LETTER Q
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
do we need a module with predefined 'missing from unicode' characters?
I don't think so. We can end up with a neverending and always
incomplete list (with theoretically unlimited number of entries),
usable only to those few people who will care
On 1/17/2014 7:39 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
do we need a module with predefined 'missing from unicode' characters?
I don't think so. We can end up with a neverending and always
incomplete list (with theoretically unlimited number of
On 01/17/2014 07:39 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Thomas and Rik most probably need just the existing mechanism to work
properly. Well, it might be slightly different for Thomas where
Ancient Greek has a limited set of letters, but then such a list
should better be defined in an ancient greek
I don't think so. We can end up with a neverending and always
incomplete list (with theoretically unlimited number of entries),
usable only to those few people who will care to contribute.
I couldn't agree more. Unicode already has mechanisms to encode just
about any accented character, and
