> Here it does work after installation of cont-fnt.zip. Or the current
> Debian context package.
Hmm, I think the mess of tex configuration files in Unix has finally
defeated me, and I will switch to using the debian context package and
will retry Aditya's assignment document. That will also invo
Hi Sanjoy!
On Mon, 11 Dez 2006, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
> > > Nup, doesn't work:
> > > kpathsea: Running mktextfm texnansi-uplr8a
> > > Is this a context problem or do I have some fonts missing?
> >
> > Probably a case of fonts missing. Those fonts are in cont-fnt.zip that
> > is not in TeXLive (
> > Nup, doesn't work:
> > kpathsea: Running mktextfm texnansi-uplr8a
> > Is this a context problem or do I have some fonts missing?
>
> Probably a case of fonts missing. Those fonts are in cont-fnt.zip that
> is not in TeXLive (nor will it be added anytime soon). But FWIW, this
> means the bi
On Mon, 11 Dez 2006, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> >Nup, doesn't work:
> > kpathsea: Running mktextfm texnansi-uplr8a
> >Is this a context problem or do I have some fonts missing?
>
> Probably a case of fonts missing. Those fonts are in cont-fnt.zip that
Thanks, this worked. Nice ...
Best wishes
Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Dez 2006, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>
>>That depends on whether you want your packages to be one-on-one
>>compatible with TeXLive or not, and that is something you should
>
> No, the more the better.
>
>>decide for yourself. From my side this is a no-brainer:
Hi Hans!
On Mon, 11 Dez 2006, Hans Hagen wrote:
> >Are all of them DFSG free? cont-tmf I know, about the others I don't
> >know.
> >
> as far as we know, they're all free (at least, before adding something
> to the ext file, taco tests the structure etc etc); the third party
> modules are col
Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi Danai!
>
> On Son, 10 Dez 2006, Danai SAE-HAN wrote:
>
>>> So here is -0.2, which does the following:
>>> - install doc files
>>> - do NOT install any map activation files in /etc/texmf/updmap.d
>>>
>> So if I understand correctly, ConTeXt (which I haven't use
Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi Taco!
>
> On Mon, 11 Dez 2006, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>
>>>Nup, doesn't work:
>>> kpathsea: Running mktextfm texnansi-uplr8a
>>>Is this a context problem or do I have some fonts missing?
>>
>>Probably a case of fonts missing. Those fonts are in cont-fnt.zip that
Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi Taco!
>
> (BTW: Sorry for bothering with all this, and thanks for the support!)
>
> On Mon, 11 Dez 2006, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>
>>> What else would make sense?
>>> - cont-tmf.zip
>>> - cont-fnt.zip
>>> - cont-img.zip ???
>>> - cont-ext.zip ???
>>>
>> The most
Hi Taco!
(BTW: Sorry for bothering with all this, and thanks for the support!)
On Mon, 11 Dez 2006, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> >What else would make sense?
> >- cont-tmf.zip
> >- cont-fnt.zip
> >- cont-img.zip ???
> >- cont-ext.zip ???
>
> The most important ones (besides cont-tmf) are cont-fnt and
Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Dez 2006, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>
>> That depends on whether you want your packages to be one-on-one
>> compatible with TeXLive or not, and that is something you should
>>
>
> No, the more the better.
>
>
>> decide for yourself. From my side this is
On Mon, 11 Dez 2006, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> That depends on whether you want your packages to be one-on-one
> compatible with TeXLive or not, and that is something you should
No, the more the better.
> decide for yourself. From my side this is a no-brainer: the more
> context support, the bette
Hi Taco!
On Mon, 11 Dez 2006, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> >Nup, doesn't work:
> > kpathsea: Running mktextfm texnansi-uplr8a
> >Is this a context problem or do I have some fonts missing?
>
> Probably a case of fonts missing. Those fonts are in cont-fnt.zip that
> is not in TeXLive (nor will it be
Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi Aditya!
>
> On Son, 10 Dez 2006, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>
>>This is a simple document that uses URW-Pallatino fonts and some mp
>>backgrounds. Sanjoy had some trouble with the fonts due to missing map
>>files. If the document compiles correctly, it will verify that
Hi Aditya!
On Son, 10 Dez 2006, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> This is a simple document that uses URW-Pallatino fonts and some mp
> backgrounds. Sanjoy had some trouble with the fonts due to missing map
> files. If the document compiles correctly, it will verify that the
> URW-Pallatino map files are
Norbert Preining wrote:
>
> If someone can explain me the big changes? Something like: We don't need
> the map files anymore or so would be nice.
Yes, this all looks fine. The removed .encs and .maps were already
obsolete for a while now. A few others were moved around by request
from texlive, an
Hi all!
I have created a new context package 2006.12.07-0.1 for Debian and would
like to hear your comments and test. No big changes:
* new upstream
* suggest fontforge, and let texfont call fontforge instead of pfaedit
* add dpatch build-dep and adjust rules
As usual available from
deb(-s
17 matches
Mail list logo
