nico wrote:
>> nico wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> There's something wrong in using (old)texexec/metapost on an input
>>> file named file.001.tex (I guess that 001 could be any number): the mp
>>> graphic is not generated. If I change file.001.tex to file.tex, it
>>> works ok.
>>>
>>> I attach t
> nico wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> There's something wrong in using (old)texexec/metapost on an input
>> file named file.001.tex (I guess that 001 could be any number): the mp
>> graphic is not generated. If I change file.001.tex to file.tex, it
>> works ok.
>>
>> I attach the test file used if it can b
nico wrote:
> Hello,
>
> There's something wrong in using (old)texexec/metapost on an input
> file named file.001.tex (I guess that 001 could be any number): the mp
> graphic is not generated. If I change file.001.tex to file.tex, it
> works ok.
>
> I attach the test file used if it can be usefu
Yes, that's a known problem. Have a look at this thread:
http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/
20050912.154547.be0e5d5c.en.html
Does it work with newtexexec?
Thomas
On Apr 20, 2006, at 12:14 AM, nico wrote:
> Hello,
>
> There's something wrong in using (old)texexec/metapost on an input
Hello,
There's something wrong in using (old)texexec/metapost on an input file
named file.001.tex (I guess that 001 could be any number): the mp graphic
is not generated. If I change file.001.tex to file.tex, it works ok.
I attach the test file used if it can be useful.
Regards,
BG
try2.0
