Several iterations of MK2 ago (in 2007), I was able to produce:
1. History
1.1 Pre-Greek (Babylonian and Egyptian) sundials
1.2 Greek and Roman sundials
1.3 Byzantine sundials
2. Catalog (descriptions with photos, rough dating, evaluation)
2.1 The Tower of the Winds
Hi Wolfgang
In the meantime I found another way of getting the desired result. I am
now using
enumerations out of the box, without needing extra counters.
After a bit of experimenting, this is what I did
% test code
\defineenumeration[artikel][location=left,text=Artikel,headstyle=bold,stopper=
2007/10/23, WN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi,
>
> I want to make a numbered list as follows
>
> *Artikel 1. First artikel
>
> *1.1. Text for item 1.1.
> 1.2. Text for item 1.2
>
> *Artikel 2. Second artikel*
>
> 2.1. Text for item 2.1
> 2.2. Text for item 2.2
>
> etc.
>
> I am trying to accomplish
Hi,
I want to make a numbered list as follows
*Artikel 1. First artikel
*1.1. Text for item 1.1.
1.2. Text for item 1.2
*Artikel 2. Second artikel*
2.1. Text for item 2.1
2.2. Text for item 2.2
etc.
I am trying to accomplish this with \setupitemgroup and \defineitemgroup as
follows, but t
Hi, Aditya—
This works perfectly (after changing the Yen-signs for backslashes).
It behaves as expected when adapted and will be a great help in
producing a number of the TOCs that are on my horizon. Many thanks
for your time and help!
All best, Alan
> On Oct 1, 2007, at 8:11 PM, Aditya Ma
Hi Alan,
On Mon, 1 Oct 2007, Alan Bowen wrote:
> 1. History
> 1.1 Pre-Greek (Babylonian and Egyptian) sundials
> 1.2 Greek and Roman sundials
> 1.3 Byzantine sundials
>
> is the goal. Sadly, adding “serried” destroys the indentation of the
> subitems.
I could not find a clean
Hi, Aditya—
Many thanks. That works and looks quite good. I experimented and find
that
\startitemize[repeat,broad]\getbuffer\stopitemize
looks best. The only downside is that there is still largish a gap
between the stopper and the text of the main item as in
1.History
1.1
Am 2007-09-30 um 23:29 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
>> \startitemize[repeat,4*borad]\getbuffer\stopitemize
> ^^^
> (add this)
been too much to the movies, eh? ;-)
I guess that should be "broad"...
Greetlings from Lake Constance!
Hraban
---
http://
On Sun, 30 Sep 2007, Alan Bowen wrote:
> Thanks, Aditya, I have adapted this as follows—
> \startbuffer
> \item item 1
> \startitemize[n,stopper={},width=1em]
> \item item 1.1
> \item item 1.2
> \item item 1.3
> \stopitemize
> \item item 2
>\startitemize[n,stopper={},width=1em]
> \item
Thanks, Aditya, I have adapted this as follows—
\startbuffer
\item item 1
\startitemize[n,stopper={},width=1em]
\item item 1.1
\item item 1.2
\item item 1.3
\stopitemize
\item item 2
\startitemize[n,stopper={},width=1em]
\item item 2.1
\item item 2.2
\item item 2.3
Thanks, Wolfgang. This is good start. The problem now is that
with
\def\firstlevelnumber#1{\xdef\thefirstlevelnumber{#1}#1}
\defineconversion[firstlevelnumber][\firstlevelnumber]
\def\secondlevelnumber#1{\thefirstlevelnumber.#1}
\defineconversion[secondlevelnumber][\secondlevelnumber]
\starttext
On Sun, 30 Sep 2007, Alan Bowen wrote:
> I need to produce an lengthy itemization of the form:
> 1.
> 1.1
> 1.2
> 2.
> 2.1
>
> I can get:
> 1.
> 1
> 2
> 2.
> 1
> easily enough, but how can I get the main division num
2007/9/30, Alan Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I need to produce an lengthy itemization of the form:
> 1.
> 1.1
> 1.2
> 2.
> 2.1
>
> I can get:
> 1.
> 1
> 2
> 2.
> 1
> easily enough, but how can I get the main division number to repeat in the
> subi
I need to produce an lengthy itemization of the form:
1.
1.1
1.2
2.
2.1
I can get:
1.
1
2
2.
1
easily enough, but how can I get the main division number to repeat
in the subitem numeration?
Alan
___
14 matches
Mail list logo
