Re: [NTG-context] PDF/A no longer compliant?

2018-11-30 Thread luigi scarso
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 7:17 AM luigi scarso wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 2:28 AM Rik Kabel > wrote: > >> On 11/4/2018 07:27, luigi scarso wrote: >> >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 7:06 PM Rik Kabel >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >> it should be fixed in the next beta. >> >> >> I am afraid it is

Re: [NTG-context] PDF/A no longer compliant?

2018-11-29 Thread luigi scarso
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 2:28 AM Rik Kabel wrote: > On 11/4/2018 07:27, luigi scarso wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 7:06 PM Rik Kabel > wrote: > >> >> > it should be fixed in the next beta. > > > I am afraid it is not fixed. The compilation of the wiki example now fails > with: > > lua

Re: [NTG-context] PDF/A no longer compliant?

2018-11-29 Thread Rik Kabel
On 11/4/2018 07:27, luigi scarso wrote: On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 7:06 PM Rik Kabel > wrote: it should be fixed in the next beta. I am afraid it is not fixed. The compilation of the wiki example now fails with: lua error   > lua error on line

Re: [NTG-context] PDF/A no longer compliant?

2018-11-04 Thread luigi scarso
On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 7:06 PM Rik Kabel wrote: > The example file in the wiki (at https://wiki.contextgarden.net/PDF/A) > no longer verifies as compliant PDF/A. VeraPDF rejects it, and > https://www.pdf-online.com/osa/validate.aspx complains: > > x107.pdf > Compliance pdfa-1b > Result Document

Re: [NTG-context] PDF/A no longer compliant?

2018-11-03 Thread luigi scarso
On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 1:58 PM Leo Nikkilä wrote: > I’m afraid I don’t remember exactly which validator that was. I tried a > few such as veraPDF and Adobe Acrobat’s preflight verifier. > > I found one of the preflight output files from Acrobat (but not the input > document unfortunately) and

Re: [NTG-context] PDF/A no longer compliant?

2018-11-03 Thread Leo Nikkilä
I’m afraid I don’t remember exactly which validator that was. I tried a few such as veraPDF and Adobe Acrobat’s preflight verifier. I found one of the preflight output files from Acrobat (but not the input document unfortunately) and these were the errors when validated against PDF/A-3a: 1.

Re: [NTG-context] PDF/A no longer compliant?

2018-11-03 Thread luigi scarso
On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 9:03 PM Leo Nikkilä wrote: > I tried PDF/A a while back and noticed the XMP header has an extra byte > order mark which validators flagged as “??”. > > I’ve attached the patch I used to remove it, however I’m still on an old > version of ConTeXt so this might not apply

Re: [NTG-context] PDF/A no longer compliant?

2018-11-02 Thread Leo Nikkilä
I tried PDF/A a while back and noticed the XMP header has an extra byte order mark which validators flagged as “??”. I’ve attached the patch I used to remove it, however I’m still on an old version of ConTeXt so this might not apply cleanly to yours. You might need to open the patch in a hex

Re: [NTG-context] PDF/A no longer compliant?

2018-11-02 Thread luigi scarso
Il giorno ven 2 nov 2018, 19:06 Rik Kabel ha scritto: > The example file in the wiki (at https://wiki.contextgarden.net/PDF/A) > no longer verifies as compliant PDF/A. VeraPDF rejects it, and > https://www.pdf-online.com/osa/validate.aspx complains: > > x107.pdf > Compliance pdfa-1b > Result

[NTG-context] PDF/A no longer compliant?

2018-11-02 Thread Rik Kabel
The example file in the wiki  (at https://wiki.contextgarden.net/PDF/A) no longer verifies as compliant PDF/A. VeraPDF rejects it, and https://www.pdf-online.com/osa/validate.aspx complains: x107.pdf Compliance pdfa-1b Result Document does not conform to PDF/A. Details