Hello,
thanks for explanation -
I could not understand difference in behavior inside \def ("--" dismiss all following)
and out of \def ("--" acts on the one line only);
so the explanation is "\startluacode INSIDE MACRO body acts like any such catcode
regime changing operation"...
Best
On 6/14/2018 9:20 PM, Tomas Hala wrote:
Hi Lukáš,
I am not sure but I guess that the problem is related with the behaviour of
the input processor which erases characters at the end of line (CR, LF) and
replace them by a space. Then, the whole content between \start/stopluacode
is at only one
Hi Lukáš,
I am not sure but I guess that the problem is related with the behaviour of
the input processor which erases characters at the end of line (CR, LF) and
replace them by a space. Then, the whole content between \start/stopluacode
is at only one line. If you the second way of comment
Hello,
I encountered a phenomena that I cannot understand. Let's have the following
code:
\def\T{%
\startluacode
context("t")
\stopluacode
}
\def\U{%
\startluacode
--
context("u")
\stopluacode
}
\starttext
A
\startluacode
--
context("b")
Hello,
I encountered a phenomena that I cannot understand. Let's have the following
code:
\def\T{%
\startluacode
context("t")
\stopluacode
}
\def\U{%
\startluacode
--
context("u")
\stopluacode
}
\starttext
A
\startluacode
--
context("b")
\stopluacode