Re: [NTG-context] Prime and overbar

2014-08-20 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Wed, 20 Aug 2014, Xan wrote: On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 09:38:49 +0200 Xan ha escrit: Hi, $\overbar{OA'} = 3,4$, puts me overbar with two steps: one for $O$ and one for $A'$. Is there any way for putting overbar just "on top" of the expression? Th

Re: [NTG-context] Prime and overbar

2014-08-20 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014, Xan wrote: On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 09:38:49 +0200 Xan ha escrit: Hi, $\overbar{OA'} = 3,4$, puts me overbar with two steps: one for $O$ and one for $A'$. Is there any way for putting overbar just "on top" of the expression? Thanks, Xan Yes. That is a very old version

Re: [NTG-context] Prime and overbar

2014-08-20 Thread Xan
On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 09:38:49 +0200 Xan ha escrit: > Hi, > > $\overbar{OA'} = 3,4$, puts me overbar with two steps: one for $O$ and one > for $A'$. Is there any way for putting overbar just "on top" of the > expression? > > Thanks, > Xan > > PS: Please CCme Yes. x.pdf Description: Adobe

Re: [NTG-context] Prime and overbar

2014-08-20 Thread Hans Hagen
On 8/20/2014 9:38 AM, Xan wrote: Hi, $\overbar{OA'} = 3,4$, puts me overbar with two steps: one for $O$ and one for $A'$. Is there any way for putting overbar just "on top" of the expression? Can you be more explicit? I get the attached. Thanks, Xan PS: Please CCme

[NTG-context] Prime and overbar

2014-08-20 Thread Xan
Hi, $\overbar{OA'} = 3,4$, puts me overbar with two steps: one for $O$ and one for $A'$. Is there any way for putting overbar just "on top" of the expression? Thanks, Xan PS: Please CCme ___ If your question is of i