Re: [NTG-context] Problems with mathalign

2007-02-19 Thread Wim Neimeijer
Aditya Mahajan wrote: \startbuffer \placeformula \startformula \startalign[m=2,distance=3cm] \NC a \NC =b \NC A \NC =B \NR[+] \NC c \NC =d \NC C \NC =D \NR[+] \stopalign \stopformula \stopbuffer \typebuffer \getbuffer I can confirm that there is an extra number. I do not know what

Re: [NTG-context] Problems with mathalign

2007-02-19 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007, Wim Neimeijer wrote: Aditya Mahajan wrote: \startbuffer \placeformula \startformula \startalign[m=2,distance=3cm] \NC a \NC =b \NC A \NC =B \NR[+] \NC c \NC =d \NC C \NC =D \NR[+] \stopalign \stopformula \stopbuffer \typebuffer \getbuffer I can

[NTG-context] Problems with mathalign

2007-01-03 Thread Mojca Miklavec
Hello, I wanted to keep Aditya busy now that he finished his wonderful new module ;), so ... I first wanted to ask how to number subformulas in a certain way, but that I figured out that numbering is already causing some problems on its own. Consider the following examples: \starttext This

Re: [NTG-context] Problems with mathalign

2007-01-03 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, Mojca Miklavec wrote: Hello, I wanted to keep Aditya busy now that he finished his wonderful new module ;), so ... I first wanted to ask how to number subformulas in a certain way, but that I figured out that numbering is already causing some problems on its own.

Re: [NTG-context] Problems with mathalign

2007-01-03 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Aditya Mahajan wrote: I can confirm that there is an extra number. I do not know what is causing this. I am not aware of anything in core-mat has changed. There is that extra stuff in \everymathematics. Could that be it? Taco ___ ntg-context