Hi,
> Am 06.04.2005 um 21:11 schrieb Patrick Gundlach:
>> Do you think that it would make sense to list/describe the ones in the
>> distribution as well?
> Yes, they go unnoticed otherwise.
OK, I have updated the modules section on garden.
Patrick
--
ConTeXt wiki and more: http://contextgard
Le 6 avr. 05, à 21:11, Patrick Gundlach a écrit :
Hello Hraban and others,
I wonder why bib and math modules are missing? Are they already gone
to the core?
Do you think that it would make sense to list/describe the ones in the
distribution as well?
Yes, because the modules in the core depend on th
Am 06.04.2005 um 21:11 schrieb Patrick Gundlach:
Do you think that it would make sense to list/describe the ones in the
distribution as well?
Yes, they go unnoticed otherwise.
Grüßlis vom Hraban!
---
http://www.fiee.net/texnique/
http://contextgarden.net
Hello Hraban and others,
>> I have planted a small bush in the garden, which is called 'modules'.
>> I collect third party modules and put them in one place. One of the
>
> Good idea.
> I wonder why bib and math modules are missing? Are they already gone
> to the core?
Do you think that it would
>>% kpsewhich t-nath.tex
>>/usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf.tetex/tex/context/maths/t-nath.tex
>
> Um, that might be unique to your own system. I don't have t-nath on a
> pretty up-to-date install.
that is interesting, it is in tetex 3.0, but not in the distribution. So
we should handle it as a not-
