[NTG-context] Re: Another plant in the garden: modules
Hi, Am 06.04.2005 um 21:11 schrieb Patrick Gundlach: Do you think that it would make sense to list/describe the ones in the distribution as well? Yes, they go unnoticed otherwise. OK, I have updated the modules section on garden. Patrick -- ConTeXt wiki and more: http://contextgarden.net ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
[NTG-context] Re: Another plant in the garden: modules
% kpsewhich t-nath.tex /usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf.tetex/tex/context/maths/t-nath.tex Um, that might be unique to your own system. I don't have t-nath on a pretty up-to-date install. that is interesting, it is in tetex 3.0, but not in the distribution. So we should handle it as a not-included module. (?) Patrick -- ConTeXt wiki: http://contextgarden.net ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
[NTG-context] Re: Another plant in the garden: modules
Hello Hraban and others, I have planted a small bush in the garden, which is called 'modules'. I collect third party modules and put them in one place. One of the Good idea. I wonder why bib and math modules are missing? Are they already gone to the core? Do you think that it would make sense to list/describe the ones in the distribution as well? Patrick -- ConTeXt wiki and much more: http://contextgarden.net ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] Re: Another plant in the garden: modules
Am 06.04.2005 um 21:11 schrieb Patrick Gundlach: Do you think that it would make sense to list/describe the ones in the distribution as well? Yes, they go unnoticed otherwise. Grüßlis vom Hraban! --- http://www.fiee.net/texnique/ http://contextgarden.net ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] Re: Another plant in the garden: modules
Le 6 avr. 05, à 21:11, Patrick Gundlach a écrit :
Hello Hraban and others,
I wonder why bib and math modules are missing? Are they already gone
to the core?
Do you think that it would make sense to list/describe the ones in the
distribution as well?
Yes, because the modules in the core depend on the context version.
So I think all modules should be listed, with some additionnal
information
such that
in the core since tetex-3.0-1
or
in the cvs-core since 2005 mar 01
e.g.
Textlive (2004) doesn't contains the bib and math modules,
but tetex-3.0-1 does:
ls -al /sw/share/texmf-dist/{tex,doc}/context/{maths,bib}/
(extract)
/sw/share/texmf-dist/doc/context/maths/:
No such file or directory
/sw/share/texmf-dist/doc/context/bib/:
83846 aou 30 2004 bibmod-doc.pdf
31535 aou 30 2004 bibmod-doc.tex
/sw/share/texmf-dist/tex/context/bib/:
10120 aou 30 2004 bibl-apa.tex
11327 aou 30 2004 bibl-aps.tex
37861 jan 26 12:30 t-bib.tex
1805 jan 5 16:59 t-bibltx.tex
/sw/share/texmf-dist/tex/context/maths/:
5762 nov 18 16:47 t-amsl.tex
92324 nov 18 16:50 t-nath.tex
-- Maurice Diamantini
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
