Hi Gary,
> Now back to our regularly scheduled thread...
> I'm reaching the conclusion that the behaviour I reported at the top of the
> thread is a bug.
> Is it?
> If so, is a workaround or fix possible?
We had almost the same thread in May(?) this year. I came to the
conclusion that I don't kno
> >> it is listed as \setupitemgroup
> >
> > are they synonyms? why two names?
>
> For those, who still wonder: \setupitemize is a command generated by
> \defineitemgroup.
>
> \defineitemgroup [\v!itemize] [\c!niveaus=6]
>
> in core-itm.tex
Good idea to clear that up.
Now back to our regularly s
Hi,
>> > TeXshow, but unfortunately the \setupitemize command is not listed
>> > there. - In the english manual I could find the use of this command,
>>
>> it is listed as \setupitemgroup
>
> are they synonyms? why two names?
For those, who still wonder: \setupitemize is a command generated by
> Hello Willi,
>
> Willi Egger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > TeXshow, but unfortunately the \setupitemize command is not listed
> > there. - In the english manual I could find the use of this command,
>
> it is listed as \setupitemgroup
#sigh# I get it. Nevermind.
> > TeXshow, but unfortunately the \setupitemize command is not listed
> > there. - In the english manual I could find the use of this command,
>
> it is listed as \setupitemgroup
I think I answered my own question: \setupitemgroup is not a synonym for
\setupitemize. texshow typo?
___
>
> > TeXshow, but unfortunately the \setupitemize command is not listed
> > there. - In the english manual I could find the use of this command,
>
> it is listed as \setupitemgroup
are they synonyms? why two names?
-gary
___
ntg-context mailing list
Hello Willi,
Willi Egger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> TeXshow, but unfortunately the \setupitemize command is not listed
> there. - In the english manual I could find the use of this command,
it is listed as \setupitemgroup
Patrick
--
You are your own rainbow!
___
