Re: [NTG-context] Removing Introduction section number

2010-06-14 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky wrote: Hello, I'm still in need of help with numberless sections. While using front, body,and back matter sounds goos, but it makes new pages. \subject is perfect, but it does not appear in contents. Most simple (if there is no other options) seems to use \subject,

Re: [NTG-context] Removing Introduction section number

2010-06-14 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky wrote: ...or preventing startbodymatter from making new page. \setupsectionblock[bodypart][page=no] or \setupsectionblock[frontpart][page=no] (I don't remember whether this is executed at the end or the begin of the block). Best wishes, Taco

Re: [NTG-context] Removing Introduction section number

2010-06-14 Thread Alan BRASLAU
On Monday 14 June 2010 08:52:16 Taco Hoekwater wrote: Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky wrote: ...or preventing startbodymatter from making new page. \setupsectionblock[bodypart][page=no] or \setupsectionblock[frontpart][page=no] (I don't remember whether this is executed at the end or

Re: [NTG-context] Removing Introduction section number

2010-06-14 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Alan BRASLAU wrote: On Monday 14 June 2010 08:52:16 Taco Hoekwater wrote: Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky wrote: ...or preventing startbodymatter from making new page. \setupsectionblock[bodypart][page=no] or \setupsectionblock[frontpart][page=no] (I don't remember whether this is executed at

Re: [NTG-context] Removing Introduction section number

2010-06-14 Thread Alan BRASLAU
On Monday 14 June 2010 09:54:30 Taco Hoekwater wrote: Actually, I almost never use \writetolist myself, but then I usually have special sectioning commands (in larger documents): \definehead[Usection][section] \setuphead[Usection][number=no] \Usection{...} This could be

Re: [NTG-context] Removing Introduction section number

2010-06-14 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Alan BRASLAU wrote: On Monday 14 June 2010 09:54:30 Taco Hoekwater wrote: Actually, I almost never use \writetolist myself, but then I usually have special sectioning commands (in larger documents): \definehead[Usection][section] \setuphead[Usection][number=no] \Usection{...} This

Re: [NTG-context] Removing Introduction section number

2010-06-14 Thread Hans Hagen
On 14-6-2010 9:39, Alan BRASLAU wrote: \section[number=no]{Whatever} this will not happen as the first argument is optional and reserved for a cross reference Hans - Hans Hagen |

Re: [NTG-context] Removing Introduction section number

2010-06-14 Thread Hans Hagen
\unprotect % already set: \setupstructurehead[chapter][appendixlabel=appendix] % % but was not yet hooked into: \unexpanded\def\fullstructureheadnumber {\edef\currentstructureheadlabeltag{\currentstructureblock\c!label}%

Re: [NTG-context] Removing Introduction section number

2010-06-14 Thread Peter Münster
On Mon, Jun 14 2010, Hans Hagen wrote: \section[number=no]{Whatever} this will not happen as the first argument is optional and reserved for a cross reference In mkiv, can we consider the \section commands as obsolete, since we have now \startsection ... \stopsection ? Cheers, Peter --

Re: [NTG-context] Removing Introduction section number

2010-06-14 Thread Hans Hagen
On 14-6-2010 12:14, Peter Münster wrote: On Mon, Jun 14 2010, Hans Hagen wrote: \section[number=no]{Whatever} this will not happen as the first argument is optional and reserved for a cross reference In mkiv, can we consider the \section commands as obsolete, since we have now

Re: [NTG-context] Removing Introduction section number

2010-06-14 Thread Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky
Yes, yes, yes! Thank you, friends ) \setupsectionblock[bodypart][page=no] \setupsectionblock[frontpart][page=no] -- Best Regards, Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please

Re: [NTG-context] Removing Introduction section number

2010-06-14 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Hi Alan, Alan BRASLAU wrote: I have to say that I am now a bit confused about the use of arguments in ConTeXt. The general rule is quite straightforward: * arguments in {} pairs are typeset material * arguments in [] are setup instructions and metadata Whether or not an argument is

Re: [NTG-context] Removing Introduction section number

2010-06-14 Thread Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky
How about \section[reference][number=no]{Whatever}? Or \section[reference]{Whatever}[number=no]? :o) -- Best Regards, Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an

Re: [NTG-context] Removing Introduction section number

2010-06-14 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 13.06.10 22:03, schrieb Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky: Hello, I'm still in need of help with numberless sections. While using front, body,and back matter sounds goos, but it makes new pages. \subject is perfect, but it does not appear in contents. Most simple (if there is no other options)

Re: [NTG-context] Removing Introduction section number

2010-06-14 Thread Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky
Thank you all for help. Actually, I most like front/body matter without page breaks, because it further structures the text (the thing I adore in TeX). -- Best Regards, Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky ___ If your question

Re: [NTG-context] Removing Introduction section number

2010-06-14 Thread Alan BRASLAU
On Monday 14 June 2010 13:17:54 Taco Hoekwater wrote: Hi Alan, Alan BRASLAU wrote: I have to say that I am now a bit confused about the use of arguments in ConTeXt. The general rule is quite straightforward: * arguments in {} pairs are typeset material * arguments in [] are setup

Re: [NTG-context] Removing Introduction section number

2010-06-13 Thread Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky
Hello, I'm still in need of help with numberless sections. While using front, body,and back matter sounds goos, but it makes new pages. \subject is perfect, but it does not appear in contents. Most simple (if there is no other options) seems to use \subject, but add it to the TOC. How can I

Re: [NTG-context] Removing Introduction section number

2010-06-13 Thread Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky
...or preventing startbodymatter from making new page. -- Best Regards, Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl

Re: [NTG-context] Removing Introduction section number

2010-06-07 Thread Rogutės Sparnuotos
Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky (2010-06-07 01:23): +1 for \section [number=no] {Introduction} This was my first guess to try, and it is so convinient! :) This is similar to what I was (intuitively) trying out first, when tackling this same problem last week... Couldn't \section[]{} keep

[NTG-context] Removing Introduction section number

2010-06-06 Thread Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky
Hello, It might be 100 time this question appears on the list, but I cannot find the answer. I need Introduction to have no number, and next section to have number 1, so on. My current solution gives me number 2, instead. Please, look what should be done with my code: \starttext

Re: [NTG-context] Removing Introduction section number

2010-06-06 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 06.06.10 22:57, schrieb Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky: Hello, It might be 100 time this question appears on the list, but I cannot find the answer. I need Introduction to have no number, and next section to have number 1, so on. My current solution gives me number 2, instead. 1. Use \subject

Re: [NTG-context] Removing Introduction section number

2010-06-06 Thread Yury G. Kudryashov
Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky wrote: Hello, It might be 100 time this question appears on the list, but I cannot find the answer. I need Introduction to have no number, and next section to have number 1, so on. My current solution gives me number 2, instead. There are two cases: 1. You want

Re: [NTG-context] Removing Introduction section number

2010-06-06 Thread Alan BRASLAU
On Sunday 06 June 2010 23:20:29 Yury G. Kudryashov wrote: 1. You want Introduction in the table of contents. Then you should copy section to another head, and setup it with number=no (have no time to test): \definehead[secnonum][section] \setuphead[secnonum][number=no]

Re: [NTG-context] Removing Introduction section number

2010-06-06 Thread Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky
There are two cases: 1. You want Introduction in the table of contents. Then you should copy section to another head, and setup it with number=no (have no time to test): \definehead[secnonum][section] \setuphead[secnonum][number=no] \secnonum{Introduction} 2. You don't want Intruduction in the

Re: [NTG-context] Removing Introduction section number

2010-06-06 Thread Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky
+1 for \section [number=no] {Introduction} This was my first guess to try, and it is so convinient! :) -- Best Regards, Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an