Re: [NTG-context] Status update on e-Omega/Aleph

2003-09-10 Thread Hans Hagen
At 09:45 09/09/2003 -0600, you wrote: * If my work is entirely in English, is there any benfit of Aleph for me? Sure. Consider, for example, the problem of transliteration. You may want to define a series of character mappings using otps to avoid using a lot of control sequences for accents and

Re: [NTG-context] Status update on e-Omega/Aleph

2003-09-10 Thread Hans Hagen
At 14:59 09/09/2003 -0600, you wrote: (1) What's an otp? fyi, filt-ini.tex and filt-bas.tex provide a higher level layer around (loading) otp's Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | [EMAIL

Re: [NTG-context] Status update on e-Omega/Aleph

2003-09-09 Thread Bill McClain
On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 09:45:32 -0600 Idris S Hamid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With an otp u can define the character sequence .d so that it always gives you \.d in the output. I know I could look this up, but briefly: (1) What's an otp? (2) Given a set of pfb and afm files (or a set of ttf

Re: [NTG-context] Status update on e-Omega/Aleph

2003-09-09 Thread Idris S Hamid
Idris S Hamid wrote: ...Ahh! I found it;-) http://www.dtek.chalmers.se/~d97ost/omega-example.html More to the point: http://www.dtek.chalmers.se/~d97ost/omega/font-instructions.txt Best Idris

Re[2]: [NTG-context] Status update on e-Omega/Aleph

2003-09-08 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Monday, September 8, 2003 Bill McClain wrote: On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 16:43:26 +0200 Giuseppe Bilotta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to inform you on the current status and short-term forecast for e-Omega. Could you give some brief comments for we (me, I mean) who haven't been following

Re[2]: [NTG-context] Status update on e-Omega/Aleph

2003-09-08 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Monday, September 8, 2003 Simon Pepping wrote: On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 06:08:12PM +0200, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: Uh ... not really, unless you need it for some very special stuff. The only general advancement in Omega (and thus Aleph) which is of general interest is the presence of more