Johannes Graumann wrote:
TeXExec 5.4.3 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1997-2005
texexec : TeXExec 5.4.3 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1997-2005
texutil : TeXUtil 9.0.1 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1992-2006
tex : pdfeTeX, 3.141592-1.30.6-2.2 (Web2C 7.5.5)
Johannes Graumann wrote:
HOWEVER, the citation issue persists - no change!
Can you send me an example (off-list)? My test files create no such
problems.
Cheers, Taco
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Johannes Graumann wrote:
HOWEVER, the citation issue persists - no change!
Can you send me an example (off-list)? My test files create no such
problems.
Cheers, Taco
I learned from your last rant on attachments and posted it here ;0)
Johannes Graumann wrote:
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Johannes Graumann wrote:
HOWEVER, the citation issue persists - no change!
Can you send me an example (off-list)? My test files create no such
problems.
Cheers, Taco
I learned from your last rant on attachments and posted it here ;0)
OK,
Thank you for your time.
Joh
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Johannes Graumann wrote:
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Johannes Graumann wrote:
HOWEVER, the citation issue persists - no change!
Can you send me an example (off-list)? My test files create no such
problems.
Cheers, Taco
I learned from
Oh, could you please try to verify my 'lang'/'language' tag issue as well:
just edit BibProb.bib and switch 'lang = en' to 'language = en' and see
what happens. Does that work for you?
Joh
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Johannes Graumann wrote:
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Johannes Graumann wrote:
Johannes Graumann wrote:
Oh, could you please try to verify my 'lang'/'language' tag issue as well:
just edit BibProb.bib and switch 'lang = en' to 'language = en' and see
what happens. Does that work for you?
Forget about this: after the upgrade to the most recent ConTeXt this problem
is a
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
It runs fine here, so probably you have to update your context
distribution. There were some changes so you need a fairly recent
context. But first, try re-running bibtex.
Taco,
I tried again. See
http://www.idyll.org:8081/JohSite/copy_of_profession/bibprob - same
Johannes Graumann wrote:
Hello,
I attach an example file which produces strange citation behavior: while the
single citations ('\cite[authoryears][cordingley:90]'
or '\cite[authoryears][walker:94]') work perfectly allright, the dual
citation ('\cite[authoryears][cordingley:90,walker:94]')
Hello,
I attach an example file which produces strange citation behavior: while the
single citations ('\cite[authoryears][cordingley:90]'
or '\cite[authoryears][walker:94]') work perfectly allright, the dual
citation ('\cite[authoryears][cordingley:90,walker:94]') is being screwed
up:
10 matches
Mail list logo