Re: [NTG-context] Suitable mechanism for Theorems and Definitions

2005-08-29 Thread Hans Hagen Outside
Taco Hoekwater wrote: Hi David, Not sure if you are still interested, but here is my optional title hack, revamped for a modern context distro. It creates a second extra optional argument for the enumeration, nothing too fancy. The example also shows a way in which you can access the number.

Re: [NTG-context] Suitable mechanism for Theorems and Definitions

2005-08-25 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Hi David, Not sure if you are still interested, but here is my optional title hack, revamped for a modern context distro. It creates a second extra optional argument for the enumeration, nothing too fancy. The example also shows a way in which you can access the number. This does not solve the

Re: [NTG-context] Suitable mechanism for Theorems and Definitions

2005-08-24 Thread Rob Ermers
Hi friends, In David's mail I found one of the problem I had been thinking of too, and I tried his code. Unfortionately, it does not work. I don't need it for math, but for case descriptions. A case consists of the following elements: Case 1Eating fruit is healthy Text text text - case

Re: [NTG-context] Suitable mechanism for Theorems and Definitions

2005-08-24 Thread David Antos
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 10:01:44PM +0200, Rob Ermers wrote: In David's mail I found one of the problem I had been thinking of too, and I tried his code. Unfortionately, it does not work. ... A case consists of the following elements: Case 1Eating fruit is healthy Text text text -

Re: [NTG-context] Suitable mechanism for Theorems and Definitions

2005-08-21 Thread David Antos
Hello, I'll try to be more exact in my question to prevent empty answer now :-) On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 11:48:34AM +0200, David Antos wrote: I've used enumeration features for typesetting Theorems, Lemmas, and Definitions. Two extra requirements appeared. Is this possible to create lists of

Re: [NTG-context] Suitable mechanism for Theorems and Definitions

2005-08-21 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Hi David, I saw this post and thought: didn't I have a similar problem a while back? And yes, I did, while I was stil working for Kluwer Academic. The a while turned out to be around 1999, and the code (hack) I used back then is no longer even remotely usable (for one because context was still

Re: [NTG-context] Suitable mechanism for Theorems and Definitions

2005-08-21 Thread David Antos
Hello Taco, On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 05:43:02PM +0200, Taco Hoekwater wrote: The a while turned out to be around 1999, and the code (hack) I used back then is no longer even remotely usable (for one because context was still in dutch, then), but I'll see if I can update my patch. :-), that's

[NTG-context] Suitable mechanism for Theorems and Definitions

2005-08-19 Thread David Antos
Hello, I've used enumeration features for typesetting Theorems, Lemmas, and Definitions. Two extra requirements appeared. Is this possible to create lists of those entities (something like \placelistofTheorems :-)? And is there a way to add names to them, resulting in something like