Hi,
Is it possible to put a table in another table?
Example: this code gives me an error:
! Argument of \parseTD has an extra }.
inserted text
\par
to be read again
}
\handleTBLcell ...\bTBLCELL \TBLcharalign {#2}{#4}
Xan wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to put a table in another table?
IIRC, putting the nested table in a buffer should work, but
maybe it is good enough to just add a brace group around it:
\bTD { \bTABLE ... \eTABLE } \eTD
Best wishes,
Taco
On Sun, May 09 2010, Xan wrote:
Is it possible to put a table in another table?
Yes:
\starttext
\bTABLE \bTR \bTD
{\bTABLE \bTR \bTD bla \eTD \eTR \eTABLE}
\eTD \eTR \eTABLE
\stoptext
Cheers, Peter
--
Contact information: http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/
Thanks all of you.
In other kind of ideas: is it a bug? Why we need {} for embed tables and
not for embed itemizes in itemizes for example?
Please CCme
Xan.
___
If your question is of interest to others as well,
Am 09.05.10 14:37, schrieb Xan:
Thanks all of you.
In other kind of ideas: is it a bug? Why we need {} for embed tables
and not for embed itemizes in itemizes for example?
It has to do with the way how TABLE is implemented, each cell is defined as
\def\bTD#1\eTD{...}
this means when TeX
Thanks for the technical and simple explanation
Xan.
En/na Wolfgang Schuster ha escrit:
Am 09.05.10 14:37, schrieb Xan:
Thanks all of you.
In other kind of ideas: is it a bug? Why we need {} for embed tables
and not for embed itemizes in itemizes for example?
It has to do with the way how
Hello,
a little feature request: a TABLE in a TABLE
It would be nice, if something like the following could work:
\starttext
\bTABLE
\bTR\bTD bla\eTD \eTR
\bTR\bTD
\bTABLE
\bTR\bTD 1\eTD \eTR
\bTR\bTD 2\eTD \eTR
\eTABLE
\eTD \eTR
\eTABLE
\stoptext
Cheers, Peter
--
� wrote:
Hello,
a little feature request: a TABLE in a TABLE
It would be nice, if something like the following could work:
\starttext
\bTABLE
\bTR\bTD bla\eTD \eTR
\bTR\bTD
{
\bTABLE
\bTR\bTD 1\eTD \eTR
\bTR\bTD 2\eTD \eTR
\eTABLE
}
\eTD \eTR
\eTABLE
\stoptext
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Hans Hagen wrote:
\bTR\bTD
{
\bTABLE
\bTR\bTD 1\eTD \eTR
\bTR\bTD 2\eTD \eTR
\eTABLE
}
\eTD \eTR
I had the same idea, but I used \bgroup and \egroup instead of {}, and that
does not work. Strange...
Thank you, Hans!
Cheers, Peter
--
� wrote:
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Hans Hagen wrote:
\bTR\bTD
{
\bTABLE
\bTR\bTD 1\eTD \eTR
\bTR\bTD 2\eTD \eTR
\eTABLE
}
\eTD \eTR
I had the same idea, but I used \bgroup and \egroup instead of {}, and that
does not work. Strange...
10 matches
Mail list logo