[NTG-context] TABLE in TABLE

2010-05-09 Thread Xan
Hi, Is it possible to put a table in another table? Example: this code gives me an error: ! Argument of \parseTD has an extra }. inserted text \par to be read again } \handleTBLcell ...\bTBLCELL \TBLcharalign {#2}{#4}

Re: [NTG-context] TABLE in TABLE

2010-05-09 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Xan wrote: Hi, Is it possible to put a table in another table? IIRC, putting the nested table in a buffer should work, but maybe it is good enough to just add a brace group around it: \bTD { \bTABLE ... \eTABLE } \eTD Best wishes, Taco

Re: [NTG-context] TABLE in TABLE

2010-05-09 Thread Peter Münster
On Sun, May 09 2010, Xan wrote: Is it possible to put a table in another table? Yes: \starttext \bTABLE \bTR \bTD {\bTABLE \bTR \bTD bla \eTD \eTR \eTABLE} \eTD \eTR \eTABLE \stoptext Cheers, Peter -- Contact information: http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/

Re: [NTG-context] TABLE in TABLE

2010-05-09 Thread Xan
Thanks all of you. In other kind of ideas: is it a bug? Why we need {} for embed tables and not for embed itemizes in itemizes for example? Please CCme Xan. ___ If your question is of interest to others as well,

Re: [NTG-context] TABLE in TABLE

2010-05-09 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 09.05.10 14:37, schrieb Xan: Thanks all of you. In other kind of ideas: is it a bug? Why we need {} for embed tables and not for embed itemizes in itemizes for example? It has to do with the way how TABLE is implemented, each cell is defined as \def\bTD#1\eTD{...} this means when TeX

Re: [NTG-context] TABLE in TABLE

2010-05-09 Thread Xan
Thanks for the technical and simple explanation Xan. En/na Wolfgang Schuster ha escrit: Am 09.05.10 14:37, schrieb Xan: Thanks all of you. In other kind of ideas: is it a bug? Why we need {} for embed tables and not for embed itemizes in itemizes for example? It has to do with the way how

[NTG-context] TABLE in TABLE

2006-04-10 Thread Peter Münster
Hello, a little feature request: a TABLE in a TABLE It would be nice, if something like the following could work: \starttext \bTABLE \bTR\bTD bla\eTD \eTR \bTR\bTD \bTABLE \bTR\bTD 1\eTD \eTR \bTR\bTD 2\eTD \eTR \eTABLE \eTD \eTR \eTABLE \stoptext Cheers, Peter --

Re: [NTG-context] TABLE in TABLE

2006-04-10 Thread Hans Hagen
� wrote: Hello, a little feature request: a TABLE in a TABLE It would be nice, if something like the following could work: \starttext \bTABLE \bTR\bTD bla\eTD \eTR \bTR\bTD { \bTABLE \bTR\bTD 1\eTD \eTR \bTR\bTD 2\eTD \eTR \eTABLE } \eTD \eTR \eTABLE \stoptext

Re: [NTG-context] TABLE in TABLE

2006-04-10 Thread Peter Münster
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Hans Hagen wrote: \bTR\bTD { \bTABLE \bTR\bTD 1\eTD \eTR \bTR\bTD 2\eTD \eTR \eTABLE } \eTD \eTR I had the same idea, but I used \bgroup and \egroup instead of {}, and that does not work. Strange... Thank you, Hans! Cheers, Peter --

Re: [NTG-context] TABLE in TABLE

2006-04-10 Thread Hans Hagen
� wrote: On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Hans Hagen wrote: \bTR\bTD { \bTABLE \bTR\bTD 1\eTD \eTR \bTR\bTD 2\eTD \eTR \eTABLE } \eTD \eTR I had the same idea, but I used \bgroup and \egroup instead of {}, and that does not work. Strange...