Ok. Thanx Hans.
I solve it with \#\type{patt} it look like as have it and therefore isnt
problem.
BUT now I have problem with \starttyping - \stoptyping environment too.
here is example:
This works OK...
\starttyping
c = re.compile([[
longstring - ('[' {:eq: '='* :} '[' close) = void
On 25-8-2010 12:07, Jaroslav Hajtmar wrote:
Ok. Thanx Hans.
I solve it with \#\type{patt} it look like as have it and therefore isnt
problem.
BUT now I have problem with \starttyping - \stoptyping environment too.
here is example:
This works OK...
\starttyping
c = re.compile([[
longstring -
Thanx Hans,
I did not think that inside \starttyping -- \stoptyping environment
ConTeXt could do such a check this thing.
Thanks so much. Health Jaroslav
Dne 25.8.2010 13:34, Hans Hagen napsal(a):
On 25-8-2010 12:07, Jaroslav Hajtmar wrote:
Ok. Thanx Hans.
I solve it with \#\type{patt} it
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 25-8-2010 12:07, Jaroslav Hajtmar wrote:
Ok. Thanx Hans.
I solve it with \#\type{patt} it look like as have it and therefore isnt
problem.
BUT now I have problem with \starttyping - \stoptyping environment too.
here is example:
This works
On 25-8-2010 8:49, Jaroslav Hajtmar wrote:
Thanx Hans,
I did not think that inside \starttyping -- \stoptyping environment
ConTeXt could do such a check this thing.
Well, the captured content is passed to the lua end using long strings
so nothing is processed at that stage.
Of course I
On 25-8-2010 8:59, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Is there a more robust way to do this? Perhaps making the number of
equal signs user configurable?
redefining \!!bs and \!!es is ok as they will not disappear
after all, how often does one use [===[ and ]===] in lua code (in a non
symmetrical way).
