Re: [NTG-context] Two texexec.ini files?

2004-06-30 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm
Am 29.06.2004 um 23:35 schrieb Matt Gushee:
This is a FAQ.
Oops, sorry. Except ... is there a list of FAQs somewhere? I've never
seen it.
No, there's no FAQ list. But three archives of the ML. Never mind.
Yes, I knew they had to be copied. I take it, then, that texexec.ini 
can
be in either of the above locations ... maybe anywhere accessible to
kpathsea?
Yes, kpathsea, I think so.

Grüßlis vom Hraban!
---
http://www.fiee.net/texnique/
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context


Re: [NTG-context] Two texexec.ini files?

2004-06-30 Thread Hans Hagen
Matt Gushee wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 11:13:23PM +0200, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
 

I have noticed that the ConTeXt distribution contains both
  $TEXMF/context/config/texexec.rme
and
  $TEXMF/scripts/context/perl/texexec.rme
Are they both supposed to be used? What happens if they're not the 
same?
 

This is a FAQ.
   

Oops, sorry. Except ... is there a list of FAQs somewhere? I've never
seen it.
 

They're both unused. You must rename or copy one to texexec.ini (I 
prefer it in config).
   

Yes, I knew they had to be copied. I take it, then, that texexec.ini can
be in either of the above locations ... maybe anywhere accessible to
kpathsea?
Anyway, it's a bit confusing to have two texexec.rme files. I would
suggest removing one of them from the distribution.
Thanks for your reply!
 

The reason why there are two files is that in the new tds the scripts are now in a 
separate branch of the tree (scripts); in order to keep some downward compatibility 
(also with respect to expectations) i put two copies in the tree; the one in scripts 
will go away next year
(btw, you can use textools to move files to the new locations) 

Hans 

-
 Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
 Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context


Re: [NTG-context] Two texexec.ini files?

2004-06-29 Thread Matt Gushee
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 11:13:23PM +0200, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
> 
> >I have noticed that the ConTeXt distribution contains both
> >$TEXMF/context/config/texexec.rme
> >and
> >$TEXMF/scripts/context/perl/texexec.rme
> >Are they both supposed to be used? What happens if they're not the 
> >same?
> 
> This is a FAQ.

Oops, sorry. Except ... is there a list of FAQs somewhere? I've never
seen it.

> They're both unused. You must rename or copy one to texexec.ini (I 
> prefer it in config).

Yes, I knew they had to be copied. I take it, then, that texexec.ini can
be in either of the above locations ... maybe anywhere accessible to
kpathsea?

Anyway, it's a bit confusing to have two texexec.rme files. I would
suggest removing one of them from the distribution.

Thanks for your reply!

-- 
Matt Gushee When a nation follows the Way,
Englewood, Colorado, USAHorses bear manure through
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   its fields;
http://www.havenrock.com/   When a nation ignores the Way,
Horses bear soldiers through
its streets.

--Lao Tzu (Peter Merel, trans.)
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context


Re: [NTG-context] Two texexec.ini files?

2004-06-29 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm
Am 29.06.2004 um 21:55 schrieb Matt Gushee:
I have noticed that the ConTeXt distribution contains both
$TEXMF/context/config/texexec.rme
and
$TEXMF/scripts/context/perl/texexec.rme
Are they both supposed to be used? What happens if they're not the 
same?
This is a FAQ.
They're both unused. You must rename or copy one to texexec.ini (I 
prefer it in config).

This handwork is left to you, that updates can't overwrite your 
settings.
Same with cont-usr.tex

Grüßlis vom Hraban!
---
http://www.fiee.net/texnique/
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context


[NTG-context] Two texexec.ini files?

2004-06-29 Thread Matt Gushee
I have noticed that the ConTeXt distribution contains both

$TEXMF/context/config/texexec.rme

and

$TEXMF/scripts/context/perl/texexec.rme

Are they both supposed to be used? What happens if they're not the same?

Thanks.

-- 
Matt Gushee When a nation follows the Way,
Englewood, Colorado, USAHorses bear manure through
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   its fields;
http://www.havenrock.com/   When a nation ignores the Way,
Horses bear soldiers through
its streets.

--Lao Tzu (Peter Merel, trans.)
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context