Re: [NTG-context] about \sym{} and n*broad

2009-09-16 Thread Hans Hagen
Dalyoung wrote: Dear Hans, Thank you for the correction. After swapping first and second as you told, I got the good result. I have another question. If I use 4*broad in the first level itemization, it seems to me that it inherently applied to the second and third level too. Even though I

Re: [NTG-context] about \sym{} and n*broad

2009-09-16 Thread Hans Hagen
Dalyoung wrote: Dear Hans, Thank you for the correction. After swapping first and second as you told, I got the good result. I have another question. If I use 4*broad in the first level itemization, it seems to me that it inherently applied to the second and third level too. Even though I

Re: [NTG-context] about \sym{} and n*broad

2009-09-16 Thread dalyoung
Dear Hans, I downloaded a new beta and test your sample and mine. It works perfectly. Thank you for the prompt fix. Best regards, Dalyoung ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an

Re: [NTG-context] about \sym{} and n*broad

2009-09-15 Thread Jan-Erik Hägglöf
dalyoung skrev: Dear all, I try next code to get the following form of text. \startitemize[4*broad] \sym{Type 1} This is a test. bla bla ...bla bla bla ...bla bla bla \sym{Type 2} This is the second item. bla bla bla ... bla bla bla \stopitemize Type 1 This is a test. bla bla bla

Re: [NTG-context] about \sym{} and n*broad

2009-09-15 Thread Dalyoung
Dear Jan-Erik, I tested your suggestion. Your method produce new line after Type 1, but I want to write Type 1 and This is a test. in the same line. And I have seen 4*broad in an example in the manual. In the example, it is used to set the distance, I think. Thank you. Best regards,

Re: [NTG-context] about \sym{} and n*broad

2009-09-15 Thread Hans Hagen
Dalyoung wrote: Dear Jan-Erik, I tested your suggestion. Your method produce new line after Type 1, but I want to write Type 1 and This is a test. in the same line. And I have seen 4*broad in an example in the manual. In the example, it is used to set the distance, I think. broad seems to

Re: [NTG-context] about \sym{} and n*broad

2009-09-15 Thread Hans Hagen
Dalyoung wrote: I tested your suggestion. Your method produce new line after Type 1, but I want to write Type 1 and This is a test. in the same line. And I have seen 4*broad in an example in the manual. In the example, it is used to set the distance, I think. in strc-itm fix: (swap first

Re: [NTG-context] about \sym{} and n*broad

2009-09-15 Thread Dalyoung
Dear Hans, Thank you for the correction. After swapping first and second as you told, I got the good result. I have another question. If I use 4*broad in the first level itemization, it seems to me that it inherently applied to the second and third level too. Even though I set just serried

[NTG-context] about \sym{} and n*broad

2009-09-14 Thread dalyoung
Dear all, I try next code to get the following form of text. \startitemize[4*broad] \sym{Type 1} This is a test. bla bla ...bla bla bla ...bla bla bla \sym{Type 2} This is the second item. bla bla bla ... bla bla bla \stopitemize Type 1 This is a test. bla bla bla ...