Re: [NTG-context] beta: figure boundingbox

2009-05-14 Thread Hans Hagen
Peter Rolf wrote: Hi, while comparing the PDF of mkii and mkiv I noticed a slight differ in the boundingboxes (bb) of MP figures. While all mkii bb have the form [0 0 w h], the mkiv counterparts use [-1 -1 w+1 h+1]. So the bb of mkiv is enlarged 1bp in all directions. Is this intended?

Re: [NTG-context] beta: figure boundingbox

2009-05-14 Thread Peter Rolf
Hans Hagen schrieb: Peter Rolf wrote: Hi, while comparing the PDF of mkii and mkiv I noticed a slight differ in the boundingboxes (bb) of MP figures. While all mkii bb have the form [0 0 w h], the mkiv counterparts use [-1 -1 w+1 h+1]. So the bb of mkiv is enlarged 1bp in all directions. Is

Re: [NTG-context] beta: figure boundingbox

2009-05-14 Thread Hans Hagen
Peter Rolf wrote: Hans Hagen schrieb: Peter Rolf wrote: Hi, while comparing the PDF of mkii and mkiv I noticed a slight differ in the boundingboxes (bb) of MP figures. While all mkii bb have the form [0 0 w h], the mkiv counterparts use [-1 -1 w+1 h+1]. So the bb of mkiv is enlarged 1bp in

[NTG-context] beta: figure boundingbox

2009-05-13 Thread Peter Rolf
Hi, while comparing the PDF of mkii and mkiv I noticed a slight differ in the boundingboxes (bb) of MP figures. While all mkii bb have the form [0 0 w h], the mkiv counterparts use [-1 -1 w+1 h+1]. So the bb of mkiv is enlarged 1bp in all directions. Is this intended? Minimal example and