Peter Rolf wrote:
Hans Hagen schrieb:
Peter Rolf wrote:
Hi,
while comparing the PDF of mkii and mkiv I noticed a slight differ in
the boundingboxes (bb) of MP figures.
While all mkii bb have the form [0 0 w h], the mkiv counterparts use
[-1 -1 w+1 h+1]. So the bb of mkiv is enlarged 1bp in a
Hans Hagen schrieb:
Peter Rolf wrote:
Hi,
while comparing the PDF of mkii and mkiv I noticed a slight differ in
the boundingboxes (bb) of MP figures.
While all mkii bb have the form [0 0 w h], the mkiv counterparts use
[-1 -1 w+1 h+1]. So the bb of mkiv is enlarged 1bp in all directions.
Is
Peter Rolf wrote:
Hi,
while comparing the PDF of mkii and mkiv I noticed a slight differ in
the boundingboxes (bb) of MP figures.
While all mkii bb have the form [0 0 w h], the mkiv counterparts use [-1
-1 w+1 h+1]. So the bb of mkiv is enlarged 1bp in all directions. Is
this intended?
harm
Hi,
while comparing the PDF of mkii and mkiv I noticed a slight differ in
the boundingboxes (bb) of MP figures.
While all mkii bb have the form [0 0 w h], the mkiv counterparts use [-1
-1 w+1 h+1]. So the bb of mkiv is enlarged 1bp in all directions. Is
this intended?
Minimal example and PDF