Yue Wang wrote:
${\bf y}$ still gives me roman regular y.
sure, as i didn't add any bold definitions yet
Hans
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt |
HZ feature is still not working in the latest beta.
(Wolfgang's example is a good test for that)
2009/3/2 Wolfgang Schuster :
>
> Am 01.03.2009 um 18:19 schrieb Hans Hagen:
>
>> Yue Wang wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi, Hans:
>>> Are HZ features still working? I test the beta with one of my
>>> documents, and i
${\bf y}$ still gives me roman regular y.
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 2:53 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> Yue Wang wrote:
>>
>> Oh, Hans, another bug report, pls test this (come from my thesis):
>>
>> \usetypescript[palatino]
>> \setupbodyfont[palatino,rm]
>> \starttext
>>
>> \placeformula\startformula
>> P_
Dohyun Kim wrote:
> 2009년 3월 2일 (월) 오후 7:02, Hans Hagen 님의 말:
>> Dohyun Kim wrote:
>>> Or it would be better if the order is reversed, that is to say,
>>> if the line mentioned above and other adjacent lines comes before
>>> the hash table of individual characters.
>> then we'd need to do each assi
2009년 3월 2일 (월) 오후 7:02, Hans Hagen 님의 말:
> Dohyun Kim wrote:
>> Or it would be better if the order is reversed, that is to say,
>> if the line mentioned above and other adjacent lines comes before
>> the hash table of individual characters.
>
> then we'd need to do each assignment individually; so
Dohyun Kim wrote:
> 2009/3/2 Hans Hagen :
>> Yanrui Li wrote:
>>> There are some Chinese punctuations,
>>> such as “，" (fullwidth comma), "！" (fullwidth exclamation mark) and so on,
>>> which are considered to be "chinese" but not "full_width_close" by
>>> scrp-cjk.lua.
>>> Is this deliberately doi
2009/3/2 Hans Hagen :
> Yanrui Li wrote:
>>
>> There are some Chinese punctuations,
>> such as “，" (fullwidth comma), "！" (fullwidth exclamation mark) and so on,
>> which are considered to be "chinese" but not "full_width_close" by
>> scrp-cjk.lua.
>> Is this deliberately doing?
>
> we have differe
Yanrui Li wrote:
2009/3/2 Hans Hagen :
Yanrui Li wrote:
2009/2/25 Hans Hagen :
Hi,
As prelude to LuaTeX 0.40 there is now a beta 0.35. I uploaded a context
beta that matches this version. The most important move is that we now
have
a new math subsystem. (Specially for Mojca: iwona seems to wo
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Yue Wang wrote:
> yes, that's what the second equation points out.
>
s/second/first
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:02 AM, Otared Kavian wrote:
>>
>> On 1 mars 09, at 19:53, Hans Hagen wrote:
>>
>>> Yue Wang wrote:
Oh, Hans, another bug report, pls test this
yes, that's what the second equation points out.
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:02 AM, Otared Kavian wrote:
>
> On 1 mars 09, at 19:53, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
>> Yue Wang wrote:
>>>
>>> Oh, Hans, another bug report, pls test this (come from my thesis):
>>> \usetypescript[palatino]
>>> \setupbodyfont[palat
yep. thx.
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 2:53 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> Yue Wang wrote:
>>
>> Oh, Hans, another bug report, pls test this (come from my thesis):
>>
>> \usetypescript[palatino]
>> \setupbodyfont[palatino,rm]
>> \starttext
>>
>> \placeformula\startformula
>> P_{(i,j)}=\sum_{n=1}^{n_s} P_{{\rm
2009/3/2 Hans Hagen :
> Yanrui Li wrote:
>>
>> 2009/2/25 Hans Hagen :
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> As prelude to LuaTeX 0.40 there is now a beta 0.35. I uploaded a context
>>> beta that matches this version. The most important move is that we now
>>> have
>>> a new math subsystem. (Specially for Mojca: iwon
Otared Kavian wrote:
On 1 mars 09, at 19:53, Hans Hagen wrote:
Yue Wang wrote:
Oh, Hans, another bug report, pls test this (come from my thesis):
\usetypescript[palatino]
\setupbodyfont[palatino,rm]
\starttext
\placeformula\startformula
P_{(i,j)}=\sum_{n=1}^{n_s} P_{{\rm straight},n} \sum_{n=
On 1 mars 09, at 19:53, Hans Hagen wrote:
Yue Wang wrote:
Oh, Hans, another bug report, pls test this (come from my thesis):
\usetypescript[palatino]
\setupbodyfont[palatino,rm]
\starttext
\placeformula\startformula
P_{(i,j)}=\sum_{n=1}^{n_s} P_{{\rm straight},n} \sum_{n=1}^{n_b}
P_{{\rm bend}
Yanrui Li wrote:
2009/2/25 Hans Hagen :
Hi,
As prelude to LuaTeX 0.40 there is now a beta 0.35. I uploaded a context
beta that matches this version. The most important move is that we now have
a new math subsystem. (Specially for Mojca: iwona seems to work ok). Apart
from bringin unicode math t
Yue Wang wrote:
Oh, Hans, another bug report, pls test this (come from my thesis):
\usetypescript[palatino]
\setupbodyfont[palatino,rm]
\starttext
\placeformula\startformula
P_{(i,j)}=\sum_{n=1}^{n_s} P_{{\rm straight},n} \sum_{n=1}^{n_b}
P_{{\rm bend},n}
\stopformula
\placeformula\startformul
Am 01.03.2009 um 18:19 schrieb Hans Hagen:
Yue Wang wrote:
Hi, Hans:
Are HZ features still working? I test the beta with one of my
documents, and it gives very bad line break:(
it should work ok ... what testfile do you use?
He's is right, here is a example.
\definefontfeature[default][de
Yue Wang wrote:
Hi, Hans:
Are HZ features still working? I test the beta with one of my
documents, and it gives very bad line break:(
it should work ok ... what testfile do you use?
-
Han
2009/2/25 Hans Hagen :
> Hi,
>
> As prelude to LuaTeX 0.40 there is now a beta 0.35. I uploaded a context
> beta that matches this version. The most important move is that we now have
> a new math subsystem. (Specially for Mojca: iwona seems to work ok). Apart
> from bringin unicode math this also
Oh, Hans, another bug report, pls test this (come from my thesis):
\usetypescript[palatino]
\setupbodyfont[palatino,rm]
\starttext
\placeformula\startformula
P_{(i,j)}=\sum_{n=1}^{n_s} P_{{\rm straight},n} \sum_{n=1}^{n_b}
P_{{\rm bend},n}
\stopformula
\placeformula\startformula
{{\rm d} {\bf y}
Hi, Hans:
Are HZ features still working? I test the beta with one of my
documents, and it gives very bad line break:(
Yue Wang
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:09 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As prelude to LuaTeX 0.40 there is now a beta 0.35. I uploaded a context
> beta that matches this version.
Am 24.02.2009 um 17:09 schrieb Hans Hagen:
As prelude to LuaTeX 0.40 there is now a beta 0.35. I uploaded a
context beta that matches this version. The most important move is
that we now have a new math subsystem. (Specially for Mojca: iwona
seems to work ok). Apart from bringin unicode ma
Hi,
As prelude to LuaTeX 0.40 there is now a beta 0.35. I uploaded a context
beta that matches this version. The most important move is that we now
have a new math subsystem. (Specially for Mojca: iwona seems to work
ok). Apart from bringin unicode math this also gives a better
performance. (
23 matches
Mail list logo
