oh, I made a another mistake. I mean __complete__ set (not basic set)
font from TUG:)
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Taco Hoekwater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yue Wang wrote:
>> This is of course Lucida Expert fonts.
>> (The quality of the image is not so good, because I cannot upload
Le 29 août 08 à 12:00, Yue Wang a écrit :
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 5:58 AM, Eric DÉTREZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> The bigl, bigr ans so on are really BIG (huge even) when used with
>> lucida.
>>
>> I think that math-lbr is guilty : it says
>> *
There is one possible condition:
He failed to install the math part of the lucida font (either pfbs or tfms) .
and then to some unknown reasons
ConTeXt switch to the Latin Modern Font.
But it still use value like 8.20 (defined in math-lbr) instead of 0.85
(defined in plain TeX, core-mat and ma
Yue Wang wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Yue Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> OK, I will re sent the pdf tonight.
>>
> s/sent/send/g
Thank you. Now I no longer understand why Eric got wrong output :(
> btw, Taco, the attachment restriction (40k) is too stirct...
I do not think we can
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> Yue Wang wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Yue Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> OK, I will re sent the pdf tonight.
>>>
>> s/sent/send/g
>
> Thank you. Now I no longer understand why Eric got wrong output :(
>
>> btw, Taco, the attachment restriction (40k) is t
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 5:58 AM, Eric DÉTREZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
>
> The bigl, bigr ans so on are really BIG (huge even) when used with
> lucida.
>
> I think that math-lbr is guilty : it says
> **
> \def\LBRbig {\@@dobig{8.20}}
> \def\LBRBig
Hi,
Yue Wang wrote:
> This is of course Lucida Expert fonts.
> (The quality of the image is not so good, because I cannot upload
> large attachments. that's it.)
What does your typescript look like? Lucida Expert may not be the
same as the Lucida Bright fonts from TUG (previously YandY).
Best w
OK, I will re sent the pdf tonight.
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Wolfgang Schuster
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Taco Hoekwater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Eric DÉTREZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Yue Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, I will re sent the pdf tonight.
>
s/sent/send/g
btw, Taco, the attachment restriction (40k) is too stirct...
t.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
t.tex
Description: TeX document
_
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Taco Hoekwater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Eric DÉTREZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Le 29 août 08 à 04:51, Yue Wang a écrit :
>>>
Are you sure? see the first line of the attachment.
>>> It seems t
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Eric DÉTREZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Le 29 août 08 à 04:51, Yue Wang a écrit :
>>
>>> Are you sure? see the first line of the attachment.
>> It seems that the text you sent is writen with CM fonts.
>> The problem is only with Lucida f
This is of course Lucida Expert fonts.
(The quality of the image is not so good, because I cannot upload
large attachments. that's it.)
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Eric DÉTREZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Le 29 août 08 à 04:51, Yue Wang a écrit :
>
>> Are you sure? see the first line of th
> Allright, I'm not a font expert.
> Here is what I get when I disable
> \def\LBRbig {\@@dobig{0.920}}
> \def\LBRBig {\@@dobig{1.080}}
> \def\LBRbigg {\@@dobig{1.342}}
> \def\LBRBigg {\@@dobig{1.603}}
> \def\LBRbiggg{\@@dobig{1.772}}
> \def\LBRBiggg{\@@dobig{2.125}}
> :
Oh, My God~
Make sure you
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Eric DÉTREZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Le 29 août 08 à 04:51, Yue Wang a écrit :
>
>> Are you sure? see the first line of the attachment.
>
> It seems that the text you sent is writen with CM fonts.
> The problem is only with Lucida fonts.
This is *not* Latin/C
Le 29 août 08 à 08:59, Wolfgang Schuster a écrit :
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Eric DÉTREZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Le 29 août 08 à 04:51, Yue Wang a écrit :
Are you sure? see the first line of the attachment.
It seems that the text you sent is writen with CM fonts.
The problem is
Le 29 août 08 à 04:51, Yue Wang a écrit :
> Are you sure? see the first line of the attachment.
It seems that the text you sent is writen with CM fonts.
The problem is only with Lucida fonts.
___
If your question is
Are you sure? see the first line of the attachment.
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 5:58 AM, Eric DÉTREZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
>
> The bigl, bigr ans so on are really BIG (huge even) when used with
> lucida.
>
> I think that math-lbr is guilty : it says
> *
Hello
The bigl, bigr ans so on are really BIG (huge even) when used with
lucida.
I think that math-lbr is guilty : it says
**
\def\LBRbig {\@@dobig{8.20}}
\def\LBRBig {\@@dobig{10.80}}
\def\LBRbigg {\@@dobig{13.42}}
\def\LBRBigg {\@@dobig{16.03}}
\def\L
18 matches
Mail list logo
