Re: [NTG-context] bugs (and sectionstopper in MkII)

2010-05-28 Thread Hans Hagen

On 28-5-2010 10:36, Rogutės Sparnuotos wrote:


* Why are the spaces of prefix and suffix of \in{}{}[] trimmed with MkII?
   \starttext
   \section[one]{One}
   \in{( sec. }{ sec. )}[one]
   \stoptext


will be fixed in next beta


-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
 | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


[NTG-context] bugs (and sectionstopper in MkII)

2010-05-27 Thread Rogutės Sparnuotos
Dear list,

I thought I would try switching to MkII (+XeTeX), because MkIV looks bad
tempered [1], but...

* How does one do the equivalent of \setupheads[sectionstopper=.] ?

* Why are the spaces of prefix and suffix of \in{}{}[] trimmed with MkII?
  \starttext
  \section[one]{One}
  \in{( sec. }{ sec. )}[one]
  \stoptext


[1] MkIV problems so far:

* \in[] bug after \definereferenceformat[][]:
  http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20100525.013929.6c0016f2.en.html

* Interaction is not working (works fine with MkII):
  http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20100525.002043.bb202b94.en.html

* Footnotes get put in the wrong page (didn't manage to create a minimal
  example in the first try).

P.S. Perhaps I should be using the bug tracker for the above, instead of
 this mailing list?

-- 
--  Rogutės Sparnuotos
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___