a next beta will have
\definesymbol [bullet][\textormathchar{2022}] % • \bullet
\definesymbol [dash] [\textormathchar{2013}] % –
\definesymbol [star] [\textormathchar{22C6}] % ✴ \star
\definesymbol [triangle] [\textormathchar{22B3}] % ⊳ \triangleright
On 02/20/2011 12:40 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 20-2-2011 12:24, C. wrote:
I see.
So from your and all the other responses I take that matching math
font for Minion is not available until
(I) Minion Math supports ConTeXt (= commercial?!)
(II) Somebody ports MnSymbol files to ConTeXt
Isn't
On 02/18/2011 02:50 PM, C. wrote:
...and I was just about to ask how to use MnSymbol with context. What a shame.
Any suggestions for a decent looking math font that pairs well with Minion?
Minion Math.
See http://www.typoma.com/en/fonts.html
--
Johannes Kuester
typoma
mailto:j...@typoma.com
to do (II).
Oh well...
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Johannes Kuester [mailto:j...@typoma.com]
Gesendet: Samstag, 19. Februar 2011 20:29
An: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Betreff: Re: [NTG-context] defined symbols - question/feature suggestion
On 02/18/2011 02:50 PM, C. wrote
On 20-2-2011 12:24, C. wrote:
I see.
So from your and all the other responses I take that matching math font for
Minion is not available until
(I) Minion Math supports ConTeXt (= commercial?!)
(II) Somebody ports MnSymbol files to ConTeXt
Isn't the minion math companion an opentype math font
Am 20.02.2011 um 00:40 schrieb Hans Hagen:
On 20-2-2011 12:24, C. wrote:
I see.
So from your and all the other responses I take that matching math font for
Minion is not available until
(I) Minion Math supports ConTeXt (= commercial?!)
(II) Somebody ports MnSymbol files to ConTeXt
Hi Hans,
in symb-mis.mkiv you define most symbols with \mathematics. I don't know why
you take these symbols from the math font. Just in case the symbol does not
exist in the regular font, I would guess.
Problem is only, that you will loose most symbols when switching the math font
to
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:39, Florian Wobbe wrote:
BTW: I wonder how many contexters use modern for math...
I guess many. (Out of those who use ConTeXt for any math at all which
is a small enough group itself.)
Alternatives are only commercial Cambria and Lucida (which don't ship
by default),
An: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Betreff: Re: [NTG-context] defined symbols - question/feature suggestion
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:39, Florian Wobbe wrote:
BTW: I wonder how many contexters use modern for math...
I guess many. (Out of those who use ConTeXt for any math at all which
On 18-2-2011 10:39, Florian Wobbe wrote:
Hi Hans,
in symb-mis.mkiv you define most symbols with \mathematics. I don't know why
you take these symbols from the math font. Just in case the symbol does not
exist in the regular font, I would guess.
Problem is only, that you will loose most
On 18-2-2011 10:39, Florian Wobbe wrote:
Hi Hans,
in symb-mis.mkiv you define most symbols with \mathematics. I don't know why
you take these symbols from the math font. Just in case the symbol does not
exist in the regular font, I would guess.
Problem is only, that you will loose most
11 matches
Mail list logo
