Re: [NTG-context] \definesynonyms broken?

Peter Münster wrote: "Verhaag, G.C.H.M." writes: \definesynonyms[kind][kinds][\infull] \definesynonyms[state][states][\infull] Don't use the same command. Better: \definesynonyms[kind][kinds][\KindFull] \definesynonyms[state][states][\StateFull] Hi, Thanks for the tip! I did

Re: [NTG-context] \definesynonyms broken?

"Verhaag, G.C.H.M." writes: > \definesynonyms[kind][kinds][\infull] > \definesynonyms[state][states][\infull] Don't use the same command. Better: \definesynonyms[kind][kinds][\KindFull] \definesynonyms[state][states][\StateFull] -- Peter

[NTG-context] \definesynonyms broken?

Hi, I use \definesynonyms in several documents but it seems to be broken! For testing purposes I use the folowing command: \definesynonyms[kind][kinds][\infull] \kind{to}{test one!} \kind{t}{sonething else} \definesynonyms[state][states][\infull] \state{a}{anything} \state{ab}{anything b}

[NTG-context] definesynonyms & infull [mkiv]

Hi, the following example works in mkii, but in mkiv the first 'infull' won't appear: \enableregime [utf] \definesynonyms [StandardAbbrev] [StandardAbbrevs] [\infull] \definesynonyms [TechAbbrev] [TechAbbrevs] [\infull] \StandardAbbrev [DIN] {\kap{din}} {Deutsches Institut für Normung~e.\,V.}

Re: [NTG-context] definesynonyms

Am 28.07.2006 um 16:34 schrieb Taco Hoekwater: > > There is also this (more formal) solution: > >\def\PID{\dodoubleempty\doPID} >\def\doPID[#1][#2]{\getparameters[PID#1][#2]} thanks Taco! Cheers, Bernd ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@

Re: [NTG-context] definesynonyms

Bernd Militzer wrote: > Am 27.07.2006 um 07:54 schrieb Aditya Mahajan: > > >>You can also do >> >>\def\PID[#1]#2[#3]{\getparameters[PID#1][#3]} >>% #2 is to gobble spaces > > > thanks for that hint Aditya! There is also this (more formal) solution: \def\PID{\dodoubleempty\doPID} \def\

Re: [NTG-context] definesynonyms

Am 27.07.2006 um 07:54 schrieb Aditya Mahajan: > > You can also do > > \def\PID[#1]#2[#3]{\getparameters[PID#1][#3]} > % #2 is to gobble spaces thanks for that hint Aditya! Bernd ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailma

Re: [NTG-context] definesynonyms

On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Bernd Militzer wrote: > Thanks a Taco! > > with PID[268]% > ^ > [Fam=Rudolph, > Nam=Rudluffen, > Vor=Adam] > You can also do \def\PID[#1]#2[#3]{\getparameters[PID#1][#3]} % #2 is to gobble spaces \def\doGetPID#1#2{\getvalue{PID#2#1}} \d

Re: [NTG-context] definesynonyms

Am 24.07.2006 um 11:11 schrieb Taco Hoekwater: > > But it is probably easier to write a small database interface > layer. Somewhat like this (note that I had to change \doGeTPID > as well). > >\def\PID[#1][#2]{\getparameters[PID#1][#2]} > >\def\doGetPID#1#2{\getvalue{PID#2#1}} > >\def

Re: [NTG-context] definesynonyms

Thanks a Taco! with PID[268]% ^ [Fam=Rudolph, Nam=Rudluffen, Vor=Adam] all is ok. Bernd ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context

Re: [NTG-context] definesynonyms

Bernd Militzer wrote: > Hi all, > > > for a large ancestor-project I defined a set of informations for a > lot of persons like you can see below. > > QUESTION: how many synonyms can I max. define? I need about 4000 defs. > > a lot (as much as tex's hash + mem permits; the hash can be > 100K)

Re: [NTG-context] definesynonyms

Bernd Militzer wrote: > Hi all, > > for a large ancestor-project I defined a set of informations for a > lot of persons like you can see below. > > QUESTION: how many synonyms can I max. define? I need about 4000 defs. If you need only 4000 separate PIDs, that should work ok. > or has som

[NTG-context] definesynonyms

Hi all, for a large ancestor-project I defined a set of informations for a lot of persons like you can see below. QUESTION: how many synonyms can I max. define? I need about 4000 defs. or has someone a better idea to handle those informations. thanks for help! Bernd % --> snip % \define