Rik Kabel schrieb am 15.11.2021 um 22:51:
Wolfgang,
Can you expand on the following statements from your reply?
You can run Hans example with MkIV and the differences should be
even bigger because the check for [] is slower here while in LMTX
it's a engine feature. The main diffe
On 11/15/2021 7:06 PM, Rik Kabel via ntg-context wrote:
On your empty performance test, I get around 0.10, .11, .08 for direct,
and 0.4 for fast. With the grouped styling, those balloon to 0.50, 0.56,
0.48, and 0.44.
just for the record, here with lmtx i get (on a 2013 laptop):
0.128 0.130 0.
Rik Kabel via ntg-context schrieb am 15.11.2021 um 19:06:
So, some follow-up questions:
1. What do you mean by "only one setup" in the description of
directsetup and fastsetup? I have examples of using two different
directsetup in one after key, so it does not seem to mean that.
With \direct
On 2021-11-15 04:38, Hans Hagen via ntg-context wrote:
On 11/15/2021 6:24 AM, Rik Kabel via ntg-context wrote:
Hello list,
Can anyone provide a description of, or a point to a description of,
the differences between setups= and directsetup= for including
setups? I searched the list archive a
On 11/15/2021 6:24 AM, Rik Kabel via ntg-context wrote:
Hello list,
Can anyone provide a description of, or a point to a description of, the
differences between setups= and directsetup= for including setups? I
searched the list archive and the documents and found nothing. (That may
indicate m
c: Rik Kabel
> Betreff: [NTG-context] directsetup vs setups
>
> Hello list,
>
> Can anyone provide a description of, or a point to a description of, the
> differences between setups= and directsetup= for including setups? I
> searched the list archive and the documents and fou
Hello list,
Can anyone provide a description of, or a point to a description of, the
differences between setups= and directsetup= for including setups? I
searched the list archive and the documents and found nothing. (That may
indicate my level of search foo, but nonetheless I am in need of he