You are correct Hans, I was using Mk IV luatex as the engine, though I
could use lmtx. It's just that in a production environment I need to be
absolutely sure things work (printers deadlines and that sort of thing!)
and I know that the MkIV luatex scene always works. But I'll give the
lmtx a
> Am 27.07.2021 um 23:46 schrieb jbf via ntg-context :
>
> No, in fact I discovered that \startpostponingnotes is what is needed.
> localfootnotes does work but places the footnote immediately below the framed
> text, and I wanted it to appear in the usual footnote location, which is
>
On 7/27/2021 11:46 PM, jbf via ntg-context wrote:
No, in fact I discovered that \startpostponingnotes is what is needed.
localfootnotes does work but places the footnote immediately below the
framed text, and I wanted it to appear in the usual footnote location,
which is achieved with
No, in fact I discovered that \startpostponingnotes is what is needed.
localfootnotes does work but places the footnote immediately below the
framed text, and I wanted it to appear in the usual footnote location,
which is achieved with startpostponingnotes
Julian
On 27/7/21 7:42 pm, Henning
> Am 27.07.2021 um 06:07 schrieb jbf via ntg-context :
>
> Is there any reason why the following MWE does not produce the footnote at
> the bottom of the page? It seems like the use of framedtext is preventing it,
> but am not sure why. Can I get around this problem and still have framed text?
Is there any reason why the following MWE does not produce the footnote
at the bottom of the page? It seems like the use of framedtext is
preventing it, but am not sure why. Can I get around this problem and
still have framed text?
Julian
\setupframed[location=middle]
