On 20-6-2011 11:56, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 20.06.2011 um 19:28 schrieb Hans Hagen:
I'll put a beta on the ftp (as I needed to adapt some description related code
and as usual I'll have made some typos so you depend on Wolfgang's checking.
You mean like this :)
-\def\enumeratio
Am 20.06.2011 um 19:28 schrieb Hans Hagen:
> I'll put a beta on the ftp (as I needed to adapt some description related
> code and as usual I'll have made some typos so you depend on Wolfgang's
> checking.
You mean like this :)
-\def\enumerationsignalp{-}% 1 == enabled
+\def
On 20-6-2011 4:01, Thomas Schmitz wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:39:21 +0200
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 20.06.2011 um 14:56 schrieb Thomas Schmitz:
How? I can only see the option of creating a whole new set of
footnotes, which is not at all what I want:
The following is the best i can do (
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:39:21 +0200
Wolfgang Schuster
wrote:
Am 20.06.2011 um 14:56 schrieb Thomas Schmitz:
How? I can only see the option of creating a whole new
set of footnotes, which is not at all what I want:
The following is the best i can do (to change the symbol
each \MyNote you n
Am 20.06.2011 um 14:56 schrieb Thomas Schmitz:
> How? I can only see the option of creating a whole new set of footnotes,
> which is not at all what I want:
The following is the best i can do (to change the symbol each \MyNote you need
a counter for it):
\define[1]\MyNote
{\bgroup
\saven
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:30:13 +0200
Wolfgang Schuster
wrote:
Am 20.06.2011 um 08:42 schrieb Thomas Schmitz:
Oh, and while I'm at it: this looks like a bug to me:
\starttext
This is just a
test!{\setupfootnotes[numberconversion=set
2]\footnote{With a footnote attached.}}
This is just a
Am 20.06.2011 um 08:42 schrieb Thomas Schmitz:
> Oh, and while I'm at it: this looks like a bug to me:
>
> \starttext
>
> This is just a test!{\setupfootnotes[numberconversion=set 2]\footnote{With a
> footnote attached.}}
>
> This is just a test!\footnote{With a footnote attached.}
>
> \stop
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 08:38:34 +0200
"Thomas Schmitz" wrote:
Hi Hans,
since it took me a while to figure this out: could you
please change the occurrences of "conversion" in
strc-not.mkiv to "numberconversion"? conversion doesn't
do anything, and it was a bit frustrating to see the very
exam
Hi Hans,
since it took me a while to figure this out: could you
please change the occurrences of "conversion" in
strc-not.mkiv to "numberconversion"? conversion doesn't do
anything, and it was a bit frustrating to see the very
examples from the source were not working.
Thanks, and best
Tho
