No, the result is still the same. I realize I am being obtuse, but in
what way, specifically? I placed the code after the ^L after the
writestatus thing, and rebuilt the format (although perhaps that is
not necessary for cont-new?), but the footnotes still come out on top
of each other.
Johan
200
Johan Sandblom wrote:
> I tried putting this in the testfile itself but got a complaint about
> a missing \endcsname. So following some previous advice I put this in
> texmf-local/tex/context/base/cont-loc.tex and rebuilt the format.
> Processing the testfile did not generate an error but also no
>
I tried putting this in the testfile itself but got a complaint about
a missing \endcsname. So following some previous advice I put this in
texmf-local/tex/context/base/cont-loc.tex and rebuilt the format.
Processing the testfile did not generate an error but also no
improvement. How should I use t
Johan Sandblom wrote:
> With the following file the footnotes are typeset on top of each
> other. What am I doing wrong?
>
> Johan
>
> \starttext
> \startlocalfootnotes[n=0, location={text, none}]
> \bTABLE
> \bTR \bTD Sinuit \eTD
> \bTD penicillin V \eTD
> \bTD amoxicillin, pivampicillin
With the following file the footnotes are typeset on top of each
other. What am I doing wrong?
Johan
\starttext
\startlocalfootnotes[n=0, location={text, none}]
\bTABLE
\bTR \bTD Sinuit \eTD
\bTD penicillin V \eTD
\bTD amoxicillin, pivampicillin, cefalosporin\footnote[cef]{Ej
cef