On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 04:50:53PM +0200, luigi scarso via ntg-context wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Jun 2023 at 15:18, Alan Braslau via ntg-context <
> ntg-context@ntg.nl> wrote:
>
> >
> > On 04/06/23 04/06/23, 15:57, Berend de Boer via ntg-context wrote:
> > >> Probably some on this list already checked
On 05/06/23 05/06/23, 08:50, luigi scarso wrote:
On Mon, 5 Jun 2023 at 15:18, Alan Braslau via ntg-context
mailto:ntg-context@ntg.nl>> wrote:
On 04/06/23 04/06/23, 15:57, Berend de Boer via ntg-context wrote:
>> Probably some on this list already checked how well chatgpt answers
On Mon, 5 Jun 2023 at 15:18, Alan Braslau via ntg-context <
ntg-context@ntg.nl> wrote:
>
> On 04/06/23 04/06/23, 15:57, Berend de Boer via ntg-context wrote:
> >> Probably some on this list already checked how well chatgpt answers
> >> questions about domains one knows well and then probably
On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 03:09:02PM +0200, Alan Braslau via ntg-context wrote:
>
> On 04/06/23 04/06/23, 15:57, Berend de Boer via ntg-context wrote:
> > > Probably some on this list already checked how well chatgpt answers
> > > questions about domains one knows well and then probably noted that
On 04/06/23 04/06/23, 15:57, Berend de Boer via ntg-context wrote:
Probably some on this list already checked how well chatgpt answers
questions about domains one knows well and then probably noted that in
spite of impressive wording, one can run into quite incorrect answers.
I've been using
Hi Hans,
Probably some on this list already checked how well chatgpt answers
questions about domains one knows well and then probably noted that in
spite of impressive wording, one can run into quite incorrect answers.
I've been using it for ConTeXt, and to be honest, it works amazingly
well.
On Fri, Jun 02, 2023 at 09:58:31AM +0200, Hans Hagen via ntg-context wrote:
> On 6/2/2023 9:27 AM, BPJ wrote:
>
> > I wonder what Knuth would say about having ChatGPT write computer
> > programs, which I think can be outright dangerous. Either you get shitty
> > code which doesn't work, which is
On 6/2/2023 9:27 AM, BPJ wrote:
I wonder what Knuth would say about having ChatGPT write computer
programs, which I think can be outright dangerous. Either you get shitty
code which doesn't work, which is good, or you get shitty code which
works which is bad or Really Bad.
He's pretty clear
Den tors 1 juni 2023 11:48Hans Hagen via ntg-context
skrev:
> Hi,
>
> Probably some on this list already checked how well chatgpt answers
> questions about domains one knows well and then probably noted that in
> spite of impressive wording, one can run into quite incorrect answers.
>
> One can
On 01/06/2023 12:32, luigi scarso via ntg-context wrote:
It's amazing how the confident tone lends credibility to all of that
made-up nonsense. Almost impossible for anybody without knowledge
of the book to believe that those "facts" aren't authorititative
and well researched.
Step by step.
On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 at 11:45, Hans Hagen via ntg-context
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Probably some on this list already checked how well chatgpt answers
> questions about domains one knows well and then probably noted that in
> spite of impressive wording, one can run into quite incorrect answers.
>
> One
Hi,
Probably some on this list already checked how well chatgpt answers
questions about domains one knows well and then probably noted that in
spite of impressive wording, one can run into quite incorrect answers.
One can get really stupid responses about tex and friends, but also can
get
12 matches
Mail list logo
