On Feb 13, 2008, at 5:50 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> This error says that there are more glyphs marked as
> "used" (92) than there are actually written (85). I have
> temporarily disabled this test in the trunk, because it
> could be caused by the change in composite character
> handling in conte
Hans Hagen wrote:
> Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
>> the latest beta refuses to work with most of my (Greek) fonts. I have
>> compiled the very latest trunk (rev. 1006, I think). Difficult to make
>> a minimal example because it doesn't happen with simple "Latin" text,
>> only when there's Greek
On Feb 13, 2008, at 5:05 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> Here's a "minimal example" for the start:
> texexec --xtx --make --all
> but this has already been reported and I'm not sure if it's the same
> problem.
>
> /context/texmf-context/tex/context/patterns/lang-agr.pat
> ! Nonletter.
> l.206 4´
On Feb 13, 2008 4:55 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
> > the latest beta refuses to work with most of my (Greek) fonts.
>
> hard to check without a small test file;
Here's a "minimal example" for the start:
texexec --xtx --make --all
but this has already been reported and I'm n
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
> the latest beta refuses to work with most of my (Greek) fonts. I have
> compiled the very latest trunk (rev. 1006, I think). Difficult to make
> a minimal example because it doesn't happen with simple "Latin" text,
> only when there's Greek in the file. The error me
the latest beta refuses to work with most of my (Greek) fonts. I have
compiled the very latest trunk (rev. 1006, I think). Difficult to make
a minimal example because it doesn't happen with simple "Latin" text,
only when there's Greek in the file. The error message is always
similar:
) Fat
