Hi again,
Actually
\unexpanded\def\dotlessring#1{\tfb\normalring
{\tfx\mathdotless#1}}
has side effects, that is it induces a font switch outside the scope of
\dotlessring… So it cannot be used as such in real situations, although when I
test isolated instances it works fine.
Dear Atsuhito Kohda,
Thank you: I didn't know how to tweak the fontsizes in the command you
suggested. With your explannation I can get a good result with \dotlessring.
Many thanks for your help: OK
> On 14 Sep 2019, at 14:08, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
>
> Dear Otared,
>
> Sorry for my
Dear Otared,
Sorry for my mistake. Of course you will need more fine tuning but
\unexpanded\def\dotlessring#1{\tfb\normalring{\tfx\mathdotless#1}}
might help you a bit. But if not please ignore this.
Best regards,
Atsuhito Kohda
2019年9月14日(土) 20:51 Otared Kavian :
>
> Thanks for your
Hi Atsuhito Kohda,
Thanks for your attention, but in fact \mathring and what you suggest, that is
\dotlessring, give the same result. What I am looking for is to replace the
small circle used by \mathring by a slightly bigger circle.
Best regards: OK
> On 14 Sep 2019, at 13:03, Atsuhito Kohda
Dear Otared and all,
This is very naive idea but anyway please try this.
Just before the \starttext insert the following line:
\unexpanded\def\dotlessring#1{\tfa\normalring{\mathdotless#1}}
Best regards,
Atsuhito Kohda
2019年9月14日(土) 18:37 Otared Kavian :
>
> Can someone tell me please
Hi all,
The \mathring command puts a small circle above a letter, but in some fonts
(namely Lucida OT) that circle is too small. So thanks to a hint by Hans and
Wolfgang some years ago I use the following definition which works fine when
used alone. But in maths, one needs sometimes to use it
