On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 4:50 AM, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
While testing Norbert's latest Debian packages, I ran across the
following font problem with the recent ConTeXt minimals.
The following test file:
= cut here =
\usetypescript[palatino][ec]
\definetypeface [palatino]
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
cmsy10 LMMathSymbols10-Regular enclmmathsy ReEncodeFont
lm-mathsy.enc lmsy10.pfb
But I guess that the problem lies somewhere else. I'm almost sure that
the virtual font in Euler calls for cmsy10.pfb in which case you
cannot trick TeX with map files pointing to
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
cmsy10 LMMathSymbols10-Regular enclmmathsy ReEncodeFont
lm-mathsy.enc lmsy10.pfb
But I guess that the problem lies somewhere else. I'm almost sure that
the virtual font in Euler calls for cmsy10.pfb in which
Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The fact that the name cmsy10.pfb is discovered means that there
is a mapfile line for cmsy10 CMSY10 cmsy10.pfb in one of the map
files (original-public-lm?)
Right, in my message I had also suspected the same file:
Among the many map files that are
Mojca Miklavec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm attaching a fixed original-public-lm.map.
After testing that file, I emailed that:
1. this new .map file fixed the small test file, but
2. the larger test file did not work (couldn't find cmex10.pfb).
#1 is true, but #2 was my error: I hadn't
On Mon, 1 Dec 2008, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
Mojca Miklavec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm attaching a fixed original-public-lm.map.
After testing that file, I emailed that:
1. this new .map file fixed the small test file, but
2. the larger test file did not work (couldn't find cmex10.pfb).
While testing Norbert's latest Debian packages, I ran across the
following font problem with the recent ConTeXt minimals.
The following test file:
= cut here =
\usetypescript[palatino][ec]
\definetypeface [palatino] [mm] [math] [euler] [euler] [rscale=1.03]
