On 12/11/2018 15:54, Rik Kabel wrote:
On 12/11/2018 07:06, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 12/11/2018 11:34 AM, mf wrote:
But i should consider all the text parts with a modified kerning
and disable kerning around character sequences like "ff", "ffi",
"fl" and so on. Luckily, the XHTML markup "knows" w
On 12/11/2018 07:06, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 12/11/2018 11:34 AM, mf wrote:
But i should consider all the text parts with a modified kerning and
disable kerning around character sequences like "ff", "ffi", "fl"
and so on. Luckily, the XHTML markup "knows" where the kerning is
modified:
A para
On 12/11/2018 1:45 PM, mf wrote:
hm that is quit emessy yes? I found another solution (that we used once)
that I can turn into a helper ... I'll send it off list
\startbuffer[test]
Some ligatures: float, finance, affine, affluent.
Modified kerning:
Some ligatures: float, finance, affine, aff
did you play with
\definefontfeature[whatever][keepligatures=auto]
\definecharacterkerning [extrakerning] [factor=0.125,features=whatever]
\starttext
\setcharacterkerning[extrakerning]
effe fietsen
\stoptext
Great! Thanks! This now works:
\definefontfeature[frac][frac=yes]
\defin
On 12/11/2018 11:34 AM, mf wrote:
But i should consider all the text parts with a modified kerning and
disable kerning around character sequences like "ff", "ffi", "fl" and
so on. Luckily, the XHTML markup "knows" where the kerning is modified:
A paragraph with a modified kerning
should bec
But i should consider all the text parts with a modified kerning and
disable kerning around character sequences like "ff", "ffi", "fl" and
so on. Luckily, the XHTML markup "knows" where the kerning is modified:
A paragraph with a modified kerning
should become
A paragraph with a modified ke
On 12/10/2018 6:16 PM, mf wrote:
yes, the ligature would not get the same shrinkage or stretch of the
rest, but i don't modify the kerning that much (factor=.02 is the
maximum value). It's still acceptable.
ok, then don't use this characterkerning but use expansion (hz) ... you
can do that ext
character kerning is bad anyway ...
I'm using it to get a paragraph one line shorter or longer, or to tune
what in TeX is set with \parfillskip.
I'm using ConTeXt with a mindset developed on other typesetting
softwares. That's not right, i know, but for now i'm finding easier to
work with c
On 12/10/2018 4:26 PM, mf wrote:
Hello list,
i noticed that setting a different kerning breaks some features of
opentype fonts; that is true, for example, for ligatures and fractions
(frac feature).
It looks like a modified kerning inserts something between two adjacent
character, making the
An example of local correction, but it's not automatic:
\definecharacterkerning[narrow][factor=-.02]
\definecharacterkerning[wide][factor=.02]
\definefontfeature[frac][frac=yes]
\def\Narrow#1{\bgroup\setcharacterkerning[narrow]#1\egroup}
\def\Wide#1{\bgroup\setcharacterkerning[wide]#1\egroup}
\
Hello list,
i noticed that setting a different kerning breaks some features of
opentype fonts; that is true, for example, for ligatures and fractions
(frac feature).
It looks like a modified kerning inserts something between two adjacent
character, making them no more adjacent.
That way the
11 matches
Mail list logo
