Hi Jean and Gour,
Thanks for the comments. I would prefer muse, but
superscripts/subscripts are extremely common in biology, not just for
chemical formula, and maybe there are more things missing I didn't come
across so far. On the other hand, tables didn't work well in markdown
--> pandoc -->
> "Jörg" == Jörg Hagmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hello,
Jörg> Dear list members,
Jörg> Despite using a text editor (emacs) and context almost
Jörg> exclusively, I need a way to communicate with other members of the
Jörg> institute.
I was in the similar boat - using Emacs with muse mar
Le 02 décembre à 17:44:02 Jörg Hagmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrit notamment:
| Jean Magnan de Bornier wrote:
| > Does it mean you are aware of the context publishing style in muse? If so,
| > did you encounter any problem?
| >
| Yes, I'm aware of it and no, no problems so far.
| But before commi
Jean Magnan de Bornier wrote:
> Does it mean you are aware of the context publishing style in muse? If so,
> did you encounter any problem?
>
Yes, I'm aware of it and no, no problems so far.
But before committing myself to either markdown/pandoc or muse, I would
like to have opinions. For exa
Le 02 décembre à 16:02:28 Jörg Hagmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrit notamment:
| Dear list members,
>
| Despite using a text editor (emacs) and context almost exclusively, I
| need a way to communicate with other members of the institute. I'm
| evaluating two possibilities:
| 1. Writing in markdown
Dear list members,
Despite using a text editor (emacs) and context almost exclusively, I
need a way to communicate with other members of the institute. I'm
evaluating two possibilities:
1. Writing in markdown and using pandoc for conversion to either context
or something openable by a word proc
