Hi Jean and Gour,
Thanks for the comments. I would prefer muse, but
superscripts/subscripts are extremely common in biology, not just for
chemical formula, and maybe there are more things missing I didn't come
across so far. On the other hand, tables didn't work well in markdown
-- pandoc --
Dear list members,
Despite using a text editor (emacs) and context almost exclusively, I
need a way to communicate with other members of the institute. I'm
evaluating two possibilities:
1. Writing in markdown and using pandoc for conversion to either context
or something openable by a word
Le 02 décembre à 16:02:28 Jörg Hagmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrit notamment:
| Dear list members,
| Despite using a text editor (emacs) and context almost exclusively, I
| need a way to communicate with other members of the institute. I'm
| evaluating two possibilities:
| 1. Writing in markdown
Jean Magnan de Bornier wrote:
Does it mean you are aware of the context publishing style in muse? If so,
did you encounter any problem?
Yes, I'm aware of it and no, no problems so far.
But before committing myself to either markdown/pandoc or muse, I would
like to have opinions. For
Le 02 décembre à 17:44:02 Jörg Hagmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrit notamment:
| Jean Magnan de Bornier wrote:
| Does it mean you are aware of the context publishing style in muse? If so,
| did you encounter any problem?
|
| Yes, I'm aware of it and no, no problems so far.
| But before
Jörg == Jörg Hagmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
Jörg Dear list members,
Jörg Despite using a text editor (emacs) and context almost
Jörg exclusively, I need a way to communicate with other members of the
Jörg institute.
I was in the similar boat - using Emacs with muse markup but
