Hallo,
Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
Try \startnathequation ... \stopnathequation instead.
Ah, thanks. Is there still a way to get unnumbered equations?
Do not put \placeformula before the equation :)
Well, that changes a bit the spacing, how about \placeformula[-] ?
Tobias
__
Monday, November 15, 2004 Nikolai Weibull wrote:
> * Christopher Creutzig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Nov 15, 2004 17:20]:
>> Try \startnathequation ... \stopnathequation instead.
> Ah, thanks. Is there still a way to get unnumbered equations?
> nikolai
Do not put \placeformula before the equati
* Christopher Creutzig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Nov 15, 2004 17:20]:
> Try \startnathequation ... \stopnathequation instead.
Ah, thanks. Is there still a way to get unnumbered equations?
nikolai
--
::: name: Nikolai Weibull:: aliases: pcp / lone-star / aka :::
::: born: Chicago, IL USA
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
\usemodule[nath]
\starttext
$A = (B, C, D, E)$
\placeformula
\startformula
A = (B, C, D, E)
\stopformula
\stoptext
! Undefined control sequence.
l.6 A = (
B, C, D, E)
? X
Try \startnathequation ... \stopnathequation instead. Or patch
t
Hi!
I just began testing the 2.99.1.20041026 release of tetex and nath is
acting up. In the following document, the first math-formula works
fine, but the second one (display) doesn't:
\usemodule[nath]
\starttext
$A = (B, C, D, E)$
\placeformula
\startformula
A = (B, C, D, E)
\stopformula
