Re: [NTG-context] new typeface toy

Hans Hagen said this at Fri, 25 Jun 2004 18:46:52 +0200: >if you're happy with type-flx (we can make a synonym btw) Oh, no synonym needed for my part (not deployed in a major project). Are you happy with the approach? Do you reckon the 5.16667pt and 6.0pt x- height will be sufficient? (Lucida in

Re: [NTG-context] new typeface toy

Adam Lindsay wrote: Hans Hagen said this at Fri, 25 Jun 2004 18:46:52 +0200: if you're happy with type-flx (we can make a synonym btw) we can add it to the distribution; but only when the dimensions are frozen since it influences line breaking; Okay, sounds good. I would really appreciate

Re: [NTG-context] new typeface toy

Hans Hagen said this at Fri, 25 Jun 2004 18:46:52 +0200: >if you're happy with type-flx (we can make a synonym btw) we can add it > to the distribution; but only when the dimensions are frozen since it >influences line breaking; Okay, sounds good. I would really appreciate having some other peo

Re: [NTG-context] new typeface toy

Adam Lindsay wrote: Hey Patrick, all, I like the wiki a lot. Thanks for getting it going! It's a nice, quick way to get hints out there. As a result, I wrote up a little font-usage hack that wasn't quite big enough for a MyWay, but that I wanted to share with folks: interesting, the last time

[NTG-context] new typeface toy

Hey Patrick, all, I like the wiki a lot. Thanks for getting it going! It's a nice, quick way to get hints out there. As a result, I wrote up a little font-usage hack that wasn't quite big enough for a MyWay, but that I wanted to share with folks: