Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
On Nov 22, 2008, at 6:56 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
This must be a bug in luatex, hyphenation is supposed to be identical
but the whole algorithm is redone, and obviously not flawlessly.
It seems there is (at least) a problem with all patterns that are
supposed to
On Nov 24, 2008, at 2:39 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
I wouldn't say it was elementary, but it is fixed now. Sometime
later this week I will create a 0.30.3 (as this is a grave bug),
but if you want to verify: the fix is in the source repository
(#1576-1578).
Best wishes,
Taco
Hi Taco,
of
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
mkdir -p ../../libs/lua51 cd ../../libs/lua51 cp -f ../../../src/
texk/web2c/../../libs/lua51/* . make posix
Makefile:25: *** missing separator. Stop.
make: *** [../../libs/lua51/liblua.a] Error 2
Hope this is nothing too serious...
It looks like your
On Nov 24, 2008, at 3:11 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
It looks like your checkout is not complete (locally editted files?),
line 25 of libs/lua51/Makefile should now be a commented-out line:
#COCOCFLAGS= -DCOCO_USE_SETJMP
Best wishes,
Taco
Strange. I deleted the Makefile and let svn
Hi all,
something fishy is going on with hyphenation patterns for German in
mkiv. Here's a minimal test file:
\starttext
{\de \hyphenatedword{sich}}
\stoptext
please compile with mkii and mkiv and see the difference. The word
should of course not be hyphenated.
All best
Thomas
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Hi all,
something fishy is going on with hyphenation patterns for German in
mkiv. Here's a minimal test file:
\starttext
{\de \hyphenatedword{sich}}
\stoptext
please compile with mkii and mkiv and see the difference. The word
should of course not be
On Nov 22, 2008, at 12:29 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Hi all,
something fishy is going on with hyphenation patterns for German in
mkiv. Here's a minimal test file:
\starttext
{\de \hyphenatedword{sich}}
\stoptext
please compile with mkii and mkiv and see the
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
On Nov 22, 2008, at 12:29 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Hi all,
something fishy is going on with hyphenation patterns for German in
mkiv. Here's a minimal test file:
\starttext
{\de \hyphenatedword{sich}}
\stoptext
please compile with mkii
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 1:13 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
I suspect
the error is not in lefthyphenmin and righthyphenmin, but in the
patterns themselves. Which patterns does mkiv actually use, and how
have they been produced?
It uses
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
I suspect
the error is not in lefthyphenmin and righthyphenmin, but in the
patterns themselves. Which patterns does mkiv actually use, and how
have they been produced?
It uses the patterns
`dehypht-x' 2008-06-18 (WL)
Wait!!! Have
On Nov 22, 2008, at 1:22 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
PS: in LaTeX there is indeed a difference whether one uses pdfTeX or
XeTeX/LuaTeX since the two engines load differente patterns, but in
ConTeXt I see no reason for a different behaviour.
Hmm, that's a nice understatement :-) Fact is that
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
On Nov 22, 2008, at 1:22 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
PS: in LaTeX there is indeed a difference whether one uses pdfTeX or
XeTeX/LuaTeX since the two engines load differente patterns, but in
ConTeXt I see no reason for a different behaviour.
Hmm, that's a nice
On Nov 22, 2008, at 2:32 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
what does xetex, pdftex, luatex report for:
{\de \thelefthyphenmin blabla}
\the\lefthyphenmin is 2 in all engines
___
If your question is of interest to others as
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
I suspect
the error is not in lefthyphenmin and righthyphenmin, but in the
patterns themselves. Which patterns does mkiv actually use, and how
have they been produced?
It uses the patterns
`dehypht-x'
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
On Nov 22, 2008, at 2:32 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
what does xetex, pdftex, luatex report for:
{\de \thelefthyphenmin blabla}
\the\lefthyphenmin is 2 in all engines
ok, luatex has a reimplemented hyphenation machinery so that may be a
reason; another can be that we
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
I suspect
the error is not in lefthyphenmin and righthyphenmin, but in the
patterns themselves. Which patterns does mkiv actually use, and how
have they been
On Nov 22, 2008, at 4:45 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
My fear is that there could be some tiny difference in that
reimplementation of hyphenation algorithm. Most words hyphenate
properly and equally in both engines. This is the first
counter-example that I have seen. But that might be something
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
What I don't understand: doesn't mkiv/luatex use the same patterns
that XeTeX uses? Then why the deuce does it show different
hyphenation? For German users, this is pretty serious, a hyphenation
like niedli-ch is really bad and neither in traditional nor
On Nov 22, 2008, at 6:56 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
This must be a bug in luatex, hyphenation is supposed to be identical
but the whole algorithm is redone, and obviously not flawlessly.
It seems there is (at least) a problem with all patterns that are
supposed to end a word. For example,
19 matches
Mail list logo
