Is there an equivalent of the amstex *\overset* macro? I couldn't find it in
your articles.
Liesbeth
2007/8/27, Aditya Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Liesbeth van der Plas wrote:
The reason to write a booklet in Latex instead of in context was that I
wanted to use some
Yes. \overset and \underset were ported to context some months back.
If you have a recent install, both should work.
Aditya
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Liesbeth van der Plas wrote:
Is there an equivalent of the amstex *\overset* macro? I couldn't find it in
your articles.
Liesbeth
2007/8/27,
It doesn't work, so I haven't got it. Can I get the source .tex of \overset
and \underset and use \input instead of reinstalling things? It costed me a
lot of time to get everything work all right, so I am not very eager to risk
spoiling things (I used the ProText cd-rom for Windows).
Liesbeth
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Liesbeth van der Plas wrote:
It doesn't work, so I haven't got it. Can I get the source .tex of \overset
and \underset and use \input instead of reinstalling things? It costed me a
lot of time to get everything work all right, so I am not very eager to risk
spoiling
In context the following plain tex columnscript works all right:
%-- plain tex, Knuth p.232
$$\vbox{\settabs 3\columns
\+This isa srangeexample \cr
\+of displayedthree-columnformat.\cr}$$
%-- /plain tex
In latex it doesn't work. Latex
In latex it doesn't work. Latex says that \settabs is undefined. Does anyone
know why?
Yes, that's because \settabs is not a TeX primitive and is defined
in plain.tex (line 602, \def\settabs{\setbox\tabs\null [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
In LaTeX I guess you want to look into the tabbing environment,
Really!. That's really a disadvantage of Latex! I thought Knuth's
primitives plus macro's were together 'plain tex' and thus untouched in both
Context and Latex.
Thanks for your help.
The reason to write a booklet in Latex instead of in context was that I
wanted to use some amstex macro's. Is it
On 8/27/07, Liesbeth van der Plas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Really!. That's really a disadvantage of Latex! I thought Knuth's
primitives plus macro's were together 'plain tex' and thus untouched in both
Context and Latex.
No -- in some cases there are real conflicts, but in this case, you
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Liesbeth van der Plas wrote:
The reason to write a booklet in Latex instead of in context was that I
wanted to use some amstex macro's. Is it possible to use amstex in context
as well?
ConTeXt has the functionality for most of amstex macros. The syntax is
a bit different
