On 08/12/2018 10:10 PM, Robert Zydenbos wrote:
> [...]
> What does disturb me, however, is that I have this one chapter where
> the wrong note number is indicated (note 19 is referred to as note
> '18'), and I do not know why. Could it be that this is because earlier
> in the chapter I have also used
I wasn’t able to compile your source, but this works fine:
\starttext
\dorecurse{30}{a\footnote{Zapf.} }
\startlocalfootnotes[n=0,conversion=characters,location=none]
\bTABLE
\bTR \bTD 1 \footnote{\dorecurse{10}{abcd }} \eTD \bTD 2 \eTD \eTR
\bTR \bTD 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 \eTD \bTD 10 \eTD \eTR
\eTABLE
\placelocalfootnotes
\stoplocalfootnotes
\dorecurse{30}{e\footnote{Other.} }
\footnote[uvu-avu]{These two suffixes […]}
\dorecurse{30}{b\footnote{Knuth.} }
…
\footnote{See n.~\in[uvu-avu] on p.~\at[uvu-avu].}
\stoptext
> and that this somehow interferes with the referencing of other
> footnotes? That is the only difference I see between this chapter and
> the others.
Without the source, all I can say is that it shouldn’t interfere.
A simple way to check it would be to comment out the fragment with the
local footnotes, compile and see what happens with the referenced number.
Pablo
--
http://www.ousia.tk
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
