Re: [NTG-context] referencing figures with \in
Thanks, this completely satisfies my curiosity. On Jun 26, 2007, at 7:39, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > 2007/6/25, Hans van der Meer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> On Jun 25, 2007, at 9:24, Taco Hoekwater wrote: >> >>> Hans van der Meer wrote: Taco and Wolfgang, Here is your counterexample: \setupcaptions[number=no] % << the culprit \starttext >>> >>> Since you are referencing a non-existing number, I cannot say I am >>> very surprised get weird output. >> >> You are right and I should not expect something sensible from >> number=no, but for my curiosity one question remains: why does \at >> gives a number that should not exist? >> >> Anyway, it is not a problem anymore! > > "\in [key]" gives the running number of float, this means 1 for the > first figure, > 2 for the second ... This did only work with numbered figures, you > disabled > the number in your figure and got only the dummy sign (the bullet) > because > there was no number to be shown. > > "\at [key]" give you the pagenumber, where your figure was placed > and this > was in your example the first page. Hans van der Meer ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] referencing figures with \in
2007/6/25, Hans van der Meer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Jun 25, 2007, at 9:24, Taco Hoekwater wrote: > > > Hans van der Meer wrote: > >> Taco and Wolfgang, > >> > >> Here is your counterexample: > >> > >> \setupcaptions[number=no] % << the culprit > >> \starttext > > > > Since you are referencing a non-existing number, I cannot say I am > > very surprised get weird output. > > You are right and I should not expect something sensible from > number=no, but for my curiosity one question remains: why does \at > gives a number that should not exist? > > Anyway, it is not a problem anymore! "\in [key]" gives the running number of float, this means 1 for the first figure, 2 for the second ... This did only work with numbered figures, you disabled the number in your figure and got only the dummy sign (the bullet) because there was no number to be shown. "\at [key]" give you the pagenumber, where your figure was placed and this was in your example the first page. Wolfgang ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] referencing figures with \in
On Jun 25, 2007, at 9:24, Taco Hoekwater wrote: > Hans van der Meer wrote: >> Taco and Wolfgang, >> >> Here is your counterexample: >> >> \setupcaptions[number=no] % << the culprit >> \starttext > > Since you are referencing a non-existing number, I cannot say I am > very surprised get weird output. You are right and I should not expect something sensible from number=no, but for my curiosity one question remains: why does \at gives a number that should not exist? Anyway, it is not a problem anymore! > > The problem is that the reference is actually resolved, but it has > no content (thanks to number=no), and that triggers the special > handling for anonymous references. If the figure appears on a > different page, context will print a triangle pointing to the > left or right instead of the dot. In short: it is a feature. > > > Best wishes, > Taco Hans van der Meer ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] referencing figures with \in
Hans van der Meer wrote: > Taco and Wolfgang, > > Here is your counterexample: > > \setupcaptions[number=no] % << the culprit > \starttext Since you are referencing a non-existing number, I cannot say I am very surprised get weird output. The problem is that the reference is actually resolved, but it has no content (thanks to number=no), and that triggers the special handling for anonymous references. If the figure appears on a different page, context will print a triangle pointing to the left or right instead of the dot. In short: it is a feature. Best wishes, Taco ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] referencing figures with \in
Taco and Wolfgang,
Here is your counterexample:
\setupcaptions[number=no] % << the culprit
\starttext
I used to place references to figures and tables in the following way:
\placefigure[][fig:myfig]{Title}{Content}
mind the {\bf setupcations}, now \type{\in{figure}[fig:myfig]}-->\in
{figure}[fig:myfig] and does not result in the reference.
This however printed a dot instead of the expected "figure ".
Changing to \type{\at}\at{figure}[fig:myfig] again printed the
correct reference.
\stoptext
On Jun 24, 2007, at 16:02, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> \starttext
>
> I used to place references to figures and tables in the following way:
>
> \placefigure[][fig:myfig]{Title}{Content}
>
> \in{figure}[fig:myfig]
>
> This however printed a dot instead of the expected "figure ".
> Changing to \at{figure}[fig:myfig] again printed the correct
> reference.
>
> \stoptext
Hans van der Meer
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] referencing figures with \in
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 14:38:34 +0200
Hans van der Meer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I used to place references to figures and tables in the following way:
>
> \placefigure[][fig:myfig]{Title}{\useMPgraphic{myfig}{parameters}}
> \in{figure}[fig:myfig]
>
> This however printed a dot instead of the expected "figure #".
> Changing to
> \at{figure}[fig:myfig]
> again printed the correct reference.
>
> Looking further into this I found:
> \meaning\in --> \protected macro:->\dohandlemathtoken {in}
> \meaning\at --> macro:->\dohandlecommand {at}
>
> Still, the ConText manual tells me that
> \in{.1}{.2.}[ref] (with {.2.} optional)
> should work.
>
> In file core-ref.tex at line 2118 (2007-04-17 version) I find:
> %\def\in%
> % {\ifmmode
> % \expandafter\donormalin
> % \else
> % \expandafter\doinatreference\expandafter\currenttextreference
> % \fi}
> But I am definitely not in math mode when calling \in.
> I did some further experimentation but nothing helped.
>
> Has something changed here or is there something I do obviously wrong?
>
> Hans van der Meer
Hi Hans,
please post a example, the following works for me:
\starttext
\startuseMPgraphic{circle}
draw fullcircle scaled 1cm;
\stopuseMPgraphic
\placefigure
[]
[fig:ref]
{Text}
{\useMPgraphic{circle}}
\in{figure}[fig:ref]
\stoptext
Wolfgang
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] referencing figures with \in
Hoi Hans,
Hans van der Meer wrote:
> I used to place references to figures and tables in the following way:
>
> \placefigure[][fig:myfig]{Title}{\useMPgraphic{myfig}{parameters}}
> \in{figure}[fig:myfig]
>
> This however printed a dot instead of the expected "figure #".
This needs an example file from you. I just ran:
% hans-prob.tex
\starttext
I used to place references to figures and tables in the following way:
\placefigure[][fig:myfig]{Title}{Content}
\in{figure}[fig:myfig]
This however printed a dot instead of the expected "figure ".
Changing to \at{figure}[fig:myfig] again printed the correct reference.
\stoptext
And it worked fine.
Best wishes,
Taco
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
[NTG-context] referencing figures with \in
I used to place references to figures and tables in the following way:
\placefigure[][fig:myfig]{Title}{\useMPgraphic{myfig}{parameters}}
\in{figure}[fig:myfig]
This however printed a dot instead of the expected "figure #".
Changing to
\at{figure}[fig:myfig]
again printed the correct reference.
Looking further into this I found:
\meaning\in --> \protected macro:->\dohandlemathtoken {in}
\meaning\at --> macro:->\dohandlecommand {at}
Still, the ConText manual tells me that
\in{.1}{.2.}[ref] (with {.2.} optional)
should work.
In file core-ref.tex at line 2118 (2007-04-17 version) I find:
%\def\in%
% {\ifmmode
% \expandafter\donormalin
% \else
% \expandafter\doinatreference\expandafter\currenttextreference
% \fi}
But I am definitely not in math mode when calling \in.
I did some further experimentation but nothing helped.
Has something changed here or is there something I do obviously wrong?
Hans van der Meer
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
