Re: [NTG-context] setupbars

2012-07-10 Thread Procházka Lukáš Ing . - Pontex s . r . o .

... OK -

On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:16:08 +0200, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:


actually it does accept more units but they were pretty small (needed an
1/u)

anyhow, in the next beta we can do

\starttext

 \setupbars[unit=mm,rulethickness=1] bar\startbar[underbar]foo\stopbar 
bar\blank
 \setupbars[unit=ex,rulethickness=1] bar\startbar[underbar]foo\stopbar 
bar\blank
 \setupbars[unit=pt,rulethickness=1] bar\startbar[underbar]foo\stopbar 
bar\blank
 \setupbars[unit=pt,rulethickness=10pt] bar\startbar[underbar]foo\stopbar 
bar\blank

\stoptext


Although it's meaningless, what would

\setupbars[unit=mm,rulethickness=10pt] bar\startbar[underbar]foo\stopbar 
bar\blank
^^ ^^

produce?

Will the following setups be valid in the next beta?

\setupbars[rulethickness=1mm]
\setupbars[rulethickness=1cm]
\setupbars[rulethickness=1in]
\setupbars[rulethickness=1ex]
\setupbars[rulethickness=1pt]
\setupbars[rulethickness=1bp]

Best regards,

Lukas


--
Ing. Lukáš Procházka [mailto:l...@pontex.cz]
Pontex s. r. o.  [mailto:pon...@pontex.cz] [http://www.pontex.cz]
Bezová 1658
147 14 Praha 4

Tel: +420 244 062 238
Fax: +420 244 461 038

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] setupbars

2012-07-10 Thread Hans Hagen

On 10-7-2012 15:25, Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o. wrote:

... OK -

On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:16:08 +0200, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:


actually it does accept more units but they were pretty small (needed an
1/u)

anyhow, in the next beta we can do

\starttext

 \setupbars[unit=mm,rulethickness=1]
bar\startbar[underbar]foo\stopbar bar\blank
 \setupbars[unit=ex,rulethickness=1]
bar\startbar[underbar]foo\stopbar bar\blank
 \setupbars[unit=pt,rulethickness=1]
bar\startbar[underbar]foo\stopbar bar\blank
 \setupbars[unit=pt,rulethickness=10pt]
bar\startbar[underbar]foo\stopbar bar\blank

\stoptext


Although it's meaningless, what would

\setupbars[unit=mm,rulethickness=10pt] bar\startbar[underbar]foo\stopbar
bar\blank
 ^^ ^^

produce?

Will the following setups be valid in the next beta?

\setupbars[rulethickness=1mm]
\setupbars[rulethickness=1cm]
\setupbars[rulethickness=1in]
\setupbars[rulethickness=1ex]
\setupbars[rulethickness=1pt]
\setupbars[rulethickness=1bp]


the unit is uses for consistent stacking of nested bars; in the case of 
a unit with rulethickness that one is used for the rules, otherwise the 
general unit is applied to the rulethickness


Hans

-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
 | www.pragma-pod.nl
-


___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] setupbars

2012-07-09 Thread Meer, H. van der
There is still an issue here.

\setupbars[unit=mm,rulethickness=1]
AB\startbar[underbar]CD\stopbar EF\crlf
\setupbars[unit=ex,rulethickness=1]
AB\startbar[underbar]CD\stopbar EF\crlf
\setupbars[unit=pt,rulethickness=1]
AB\startbar[underbar]CD\stopbar EF\crlf

The first and third setup do not give an underbar, the second does.
Question: why does ex qualify as a dimension unit but pt and mm do not? 
Sounds strange.

If I want an underbar exactly 1mm or 3pt's thick, why isn't that made possible? 
Doing the math myself is no option, becaus ex will not be known beforehand.

Hans van der Meer


On 8 jul. 2012, at 23:40, Meer, H. van der wrote:

Thansk,

I see. \setupbars doesn't give a hit on ConTeXt-wiki, so I couldn't find this.
Still I dare say, it is a pity that [rulethickness=] gets a different meaning 
here than elsewhere. I would like to ask to reconsider, because I strongly 
believe in consistency in the API (though I am ready to admit that it is not 
easy to maintain and confess guilty myself at more than one occasion). That is 
either change all rulethickness's everywhere to this scheme or otherwise. Or 
did this already happened and did I miss that? And of course, the easiest 
solution would be if the code itself could sort out the difference between 
having been given a fraction or a length.

Hans van der Meer



On 8 jul. 2012, at 22:44, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:


Am 08.07.2012 um 22:24 schrieb Meer, H. van der:

This gives an error:

\starttext
\setupbars[rulethickness=4pt]
\stoptext

! LuaTeX error main ctx instance:1: malformed number near '4pt'.
ConTeXt  ver: 2012.07.04 23:48 MKIV  fmt: 2012.7.6  int: english/english

Elsewhere this is ok, as for example in: \framed[rulethickness=4pt]{}
Strangely in node-rul.mkiv I see: \c!rulethickness=2.5
whereas in pack-rul.mkiv:  \c!rulethickness=\linewidth

I am inclined to spot an error here, or at least an inconsistency in the API.


\setupbars[rulethickness=0.5]

\starttext

\setupbars[unit=ex]\underbar{ex}

\setupbars[unit=em]\underbar{em}

\stoptext

Wolfgang
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nlmailto:ntg-context@ntg.nl / 
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nlhttp://www.pragma-ade.nl/ / 
http://tex.aanhet.nethttp://tex.aanhet.net/
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.nethttp://contextgarden.net/
___

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nlmailto:ntg-context@ntg.nl / 
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___



rule.pdf
Description: rule.pdf
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] setupbars

2012-07-09 Thread Wolfgang Schuster

Am 09.07.2012 um 09:09 schrieb Meer, H. van der:

 There is still an issue here.
 
 \setupbars[unit=mm,rulethickness=1]
 AB\startbar[underbar]CD\stopbar EF\crlf
 \setupbars[unit=ex,rulethickness=1]
 AB\startbar[underbar]CD\stopbar EF\crlf
 \setupbars[unit=pt,rulethickness=1]
 AB\startbar[underbar]CD\stopbar EF\crlf
 
 The first and third setup do not give an underbar, the second does.
 Question: why does ex qualify as a dimension unit but pt and mm do not? 
 Sounds strange.
 
 If I want an underbar exactly 1mm or 3pt's thick, why isn't that made 
 possible? Doing the math myself is no option, becaus ex will not be known 
 beforehand.

The underlying Lua code accepts only “ex” and “em” as valid options for the 
“unit” key but I would also vote to accept either “pt”, “mm” etc. as unit value 
or to allow “rulethickness=…pt”.

Wolfgang

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] setupbars

2012-07-09 Thread Procházka Lukáš Ing . - Pontex s . r . o .

On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 09:26:51 +0200, Wolfgang Schuster 
schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote:


to allow “rulethickness=…pt”.


+1

Lukas



Wolfgang



--
Ing. Lukáš Procházka [mailto:l...@pontex.cz]
Pontex s. r. o.  [mailto:pon...@pontex.cz] [http://www.pontex.cz]
Bezová 1658
147 14 Praha 4

Tel: +420 244 062 238
Fax: +420 244 461 038

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] setupbars

2012-07-09 Thread Bill Meahan
On Mon, 9 Jul 2012 09:26:51 +0200
Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote:


 
 The underlying Lua code accepts only “ex” and “em” as valid options
 for the “unit” key but I would also vote to accept either “pt”, “mm”
 etc. as unit value or to allow “rulethickness=…pt”.
 
 Wolfgang

It proposal has my vote!


-- 
Bill Meahan, Westland, Michigan USA

“Writing is a combination of intangible
  creative fantasy and appallingly
  hard work.”

  —Anthony Powell


This message is digitally signed with an X.509 certificate
to prove it is from me and has not been altered since it was sent.
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] setupbars

2012-07-09 Thread Hans Hagen

On 9-7-2012 09:26, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:


Am 09.07.2012 um 09:09 schrieb Meer, H. van der:


There is still an issue here.

\setupbars[unit=mm,rulethickness=1]
AB\startbar[underbar]CD\stopbar EF\crlf
\setupbars[unit=ex,rulethickness=1]
AB\startbar[underbar]CD\stopbar EF\crlf
\setupbars[unit=pt,rulethickness=1]
AB\startbar[underbar]CD\stopbar EF\crlf

The first and third setup do not give an underbar, the second does.
Question: why does ex qualify as a dimension unit but pt and mm do not? 
Sounds strange.

If I want an underbar exactly 1mm or 3pt's thick, why isn't that made possible? 
Doing the math myself is no option, becaus ex will not be known beforehand.


The underlying Lua code accepts only “ex” and “em” as valid options for the 
“unit” key but I would also vote to accept either “pt”, “mm” etc. as unit value 
or to allow “rulethickness=…pt”.


actually it does accept more units but they were pretty small (needed an 
1/u)


anyhow, in the next beta we can do

\starttext

\setupbars[unit=mm,rulethickness=1] 
bar\startbar[underbar]foo\stopbar bar\blank
\setupbars[unit=ex,rulethickness=1] 
bar\startbar[underbar]foo\stopbar bar\blank
\setupbars[unit=pt,rulethickness=1] 
bar\startbar[underbar]foo\stopbar bar\blank
\setupbars[unit=pt,rulethickness=10pt] 
bar\startbar[underbar]foo\stopbar bar\blank


\stoptext

but someone has do document it

-
  Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
  Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
 | www.pragma-pod.nl
-


___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


[NTG-context] setupbars

2012-07-08 Thread Meer, H. van der
This gives an error:

\starttext
\setupbars[rulethickness=4pt]
\stoptext

! LuaTeX error main ctx instance:1: malformed number near '4pt'.
ConTeXt  ver: 2012.07.04 23:48 MKIV  fmt: 2012.7.6  int: english/english

Elsewhere this is ok, as for example in: \framed[rulethickness=4pt]{}
Strangely in node-rul.mkiv I see: \c!rulethickness=2.5
whereas in pack-rul.mkiv:  \c!rulethickness=\linewidth

I am inclined to spot an error here, or at least an inconsistency in the API.

Hans van der Meer



___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] setupbars

2012-07-08 Thread Wolfgang Schuster

Am 08.07.2012 um 22:24 schrieb Meer, H. van der:

 This gives an error:
 
 \starttext
 \setupbars[rulethickness=4pt]
 \stoptext
 
 ! LuaTeX error main ctx instance:1: malformed number near '4pt'.
 ConTeXt  ver: 2012.07.04 23:48 MKIV  fmt: 2012.7.6  int: english/english
 
 Elsewhere this is ok, as for example in: \framed[rulethickness=4pt]{}
 Strangely in node-rul.mkiv I see: \c!rulethickness=2.5
 whereas in pack-rul.mkiv:  \c!rulethickness=\linewidth
 
 I am inclined to spot an error here, or at least an inconsistency in the API.


\setupbars[rulethickness=0.5]

\starttext

\setupbars[unit=ex]\underbar{ex}

\setupbars[unit=em]\underbar{em}

\stoptext

Wolfgang
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] setupbars

2012-07-08 Thread Meer, H. van der
Thansk,

I see. \setupbars doesn't give a hit on ConTeXt-wiki, so I couldn't find this.
Still I dare say, it is a pity that [rulethickness=] gets a different meaning 
here than elsewhere. I would like to ask to reconsider, because I strongly 
believe in consistency in the API (though I am ready to admit that it is not 
easy to maintain and confess guilty myself at more than one occasion). That is 
either change all rulethickness's everywhere to this scheme or otherwise. Or 
did this already happened and did I miss that? And of course, the easiest 
solution would be if the code itself could sort out the difference between 
having been given a fraction or a length.

Hans van der Meer



On 8 jul. 2012, at 22:44, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:


Am 08.07.2012 um 22:24 schrieb Meer, H. van der:

This gives an error:

\starttext
\setupbars[rulethickness=4pt]
\stoptext

! LuaTeX error main ctx instance:1: malformed number near '4pt'.
ConTeXt  ver: 2012.07.04 23:48 MKIV  fmt: 2012.7.6  int: english/english

Elsewhere this is ok, as for example in: \framed[rulethickness=4pt]{}
Strangely in node-rul.mkiv I see: \c!rulethickness=2.5
whereas in pack-rul.mkiv:  \c!rulethickness=\linewidth

I am inclined to spot an error here, or at least an inconsistency in the API.


\setupbars[rulethickness=0.5]

\starttext

\setupbars[unit=ex]\underbar{ex}

\setupbars[unit=em]\underbar{em}

\stoptext

Wolfgang
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nlmailto:ntg-context@ntg.nl / 
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___