Re: [NTG-context] several details (maybe bugs)

2008-04-07 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: While typesetting some proceedings, I stumpled upon the following issues: (1) \setupheads seems to do nothing - I must set every option for every head separately. AFAIR this is broken forever, at least it was the

Re: [NTG-context] several details (maybe bugs)

2008-04-07 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am 2008-04-05 um 17:28 schrieb Aditya Mahajan: (2) \setuphead[chapter][header=none] should switch off the header only on that page where the chapter starts, shouldn't it? (It disables headers completely.) Or

[NTG-context] several details (maybe bugs)

2008-04-05 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm
While typesetting some proceedings, I stumpled upon the following issues: (1) \setupheads seems to do nothing - I must set every option for every head separately. AFAIR this is broken forever, at least it was the same in 2000. (2) \setuphead[chapter][header=none] should switch off the header

Re: [NTG-context] several details (maybe bugs)

2008-04-05 Thread David
On Sat, 5 Apr 2008 16:03:44 +0200, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: (3) \startitemize[n] Numbered itemizations suddenly(?) start with 0 - as this may be suitable for programmers, but it's, ehm, a bit unusual in every other context. I don't have the final answer on this, but I have run into

Re: [NTG-context] several details (maybe bugs)

2008-04-05 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Sat, 5 Apr 2008, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: While typesetting some proceedings, I stumpled upon the following issues: (2) \setuphead[chapter][header=none] should switch off the header only on that page where the chapter starts, shouldn't it? (It disables headers completely.) Or how

Re: [NTG-context] several details (maybe bugs)

2008-04-05 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm
Am 2008-04-05 um 17:08 schrieb David: (3) \startitemize[n] Numbered itemizations suddenly(?) start with 0 - as this may be suitable for programmers, but it's, ehm, a bit unusual in every other context. I don't have the final answer on this, but I have run into this starts with zero

Re: [NTG-context] several details (maybe bugs)

2008-04-05 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Sat, 5 Apr 2008, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: Am 2008-04-05 um 17:08 schrieb David: (3) \startitemize[n] Numbered itemizations suddenly(?) start with 0 - as this may be suitable for programmers, but it's, ehm, a bit unusual in every other context. I don't have the final answer on this,