Re: [NTG-context] status-of-update.lus
On 4-6-2010 10:31, Marius wrote: On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 9:58 AM, wrote: Today first-setup.sh ended with status-of-update.lus instead of expected status-of-update.lua Is it correct ? I don't know, but I get the status-of-update.lus file too (Linux 64 bit) Confirm that this is the case on windows too. i'll check it - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] status-of-update.lus
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 9:58 AM, wrote: >> Today first-setup.sh ended with >> status-of-update.lus >> instead of expected >> status-of-update.lua >> Is it correct ? > > I don't know, but I get the status-of-update.lus file too (Linux 64 bit) > Confirm that this is the case on windows too. ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] status-of-update.lus
> Today first-setup.sh ended with > status-of-update.lus > instead of expected > status-of-update.lua > Is it correct ? I don't know, but I get the status-of-update.lus file too (Linux 64 bit) Jelle ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
[NTG-context] status-of-update.lus
Today first-setup.sh ended with status-of-update.lus instead of expected status-of-update.lua Is it correct ? -- luigi ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___