Re: [NTG-context] texexec in ConTeXt Standalone does not work

2016-10-29 Thread Asim ConTeXt
yeah ok, Hagen. And Thank you all On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 12:36 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 10/29/2016 11:50 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: > >> On 10/29/2016 11:18 AM, Asim ConTeXt wrote: >> >>> Thank you, Pablo, for the information about the Microtype package. And >>> after a bit

Re: [NTG-context] texexec in ConTeXt Standalone does not work

2016-10-29 Thread Hans Hagen
On 10/29/2016 11:50 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: On 10/29/2016 11:18 AM, Asim ConTeXt wrote: Thank you, Pablo, for the information about the Microtype package. And after a bit more searching (and getting an answer from Hans Hagen :-) ), I am considering MkIV, instead of MkII, now. But I have

Re: [NTG-context] texexec in ConTeXt Standalone does not work

2016-10-29 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
On 10/29/2016 11:18 AM, Asim ConTeXt wrote: > Thank you, Pablo, for the information about the Microtype package. And > after a bit more searching (and getting an answer from Hans Hagen :-) ), > I am considering MkIV, instead of MkII, now. But I have another > question: How can I identify the files

Re: [NTG-context] texexec in ConTeXt Standalone does not work

2016-10-29 Thread Asim ConTeXt
Thank you, Pablo, for the information about the Microtype package. And after a bit more searching (and getting an answer from Hans Hagen :-) ), I am considering MkIV, instead of MkII, now. But I have another question: How can I identify the files that are only required for MkII, and not needed for

Re: [NTG-context] texexec in ConTeXt Standalone does not work

2016-10-28 Thread Hans Hagen
On 10/28/2016 9:06 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: On 10/28/2016 08:35 PM, Asim ConTeXt wrote: Thank you. I want to use MkII because, as far as I know, MkII uses pdfTeX; which is stable. While MkIV uses LuaTeX; which is yet in development. Further, pdfTeX is better at microtypography. In what

Re: [NTG-context] texexec in ConTeXt Standalone does not work

2016-10-28 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
On 10/28/2016 08:35 PM, Asim ConTeXt wrote: > Thank you. > I want to use MkII because, as far as I know, MkII uses pdfTeX; which is > stable. While MkIV uses LuaTeX; which is yet in development. Further, > pdfTeX is better at microtypography. > Am I correct at these two points? I would like to

Re: [NTG-context] texexec in ConTeXt Standalone does not work

2016-10-28 Thread Jean-Pierre Delange
Hi Asim, Before typing |: |||set OSFONTDIR=c:/windows/fonts you have to go to |/context/tex/texmf-win64/bin/ and type : ||set PATH=%PATH% (if your Windows system is |||32 bits |Windows, modify the command). | |Then : |||set OSFONTDIR=c:/windows/fonts|| ||After that, in the same directory

Re: [NTG-context] texexec in ConTeXt Standalone does not work

2016-10-28 Thread Asim ConTeXt
Thank you. I want to use MkII because, as far as I know, MkII uses pdfTeX; which is stable. While MkIV uses LuaTeX; which is yet in development. Further, pdfTeX is better at microtypography. Am I correct at these two points? I would like to hear from you. I found that my system fonts are located

Re: [NTG-context] texexec in ConTeXt Standalone does not work

2016-10-27 Thread Mica Semrick
Any reason you want to use MKII instead of MKIV? It looks lime you need to set the environment variable OSFONTDIR, which should point to the directory where your fonts are stored. -m On October 27, 2016 2:02:10 PM PDT, Asim ConTeXt wrote: >Dear list members, >I

[NTG-context] texexec in ConTeXt Standalone does not work

2016-10-27 Thread Asim ConTeXt
Dear list members, I am new to ConTeXt world. I have installed ConTeXt Standalone according to the instructions given in ConTeXt Standalone with TexWorks and instructions given in Windows Installation

[NTG-context] texexec in ConTeXt Standalone does not work

2016-10-27 Thread Asim ConTeXt
Dear list members, I am new to ConTeXt world. I have installed ConTeXt Standalone according to the instructions given in ConTeXt Standalone with TexWorks and instructions given in Windows Installation