Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>> On Jan 28, 2008 5:02 PM, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
>>> You need a very recent luatex from the SVN trunk (revision >= 979).
>> Should I update binaries to the latest SVN version of LuaTeX? (for the
>> platforms I have access to, i.e. mac intel, linux
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On Jan 28, 2008 5:02 PM, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
>> You need a very recent luatex from the SVN trunk (revision >= 979).
>
> Should I update binaries to the latest SVN version of LuaTeX? (for the
> platforms I have access to, i.e. mac intel, linux 32 & akira's windows
> b
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 1:36 AM, Mojca Miklavec
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 28, 2008 5:02 PM, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
> > You need a very recent luatex from the SVN trunk (revision >= 979).
>
> Should I update binaries to the latest SVN version of LuaTeX? (for the
> platforms I have a
On Jan 28, 2008 6:43 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>
> Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> > On Jan 28, 2008 5:02 PM, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
> >> You need a very recent luatex from the SVN trunk (revision >= 979).
> >
> > Should I update binaries to the latest SVN version of LuaTeX? (for the
> > platforms I ha
> But luatools should be patched as well. Passing an argument completely
> coverd in quotes is not right, even if it accidentally does work with
> the latest binary.
That's what I thought, too. Thanks for confirming it.
Arthur
___
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On Jan 28, 2008 5:02 PM, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
>> You need a very recent luatex from the SVN trunk (revision >= 979).
>
> Should I update binaries to the latest SVN version of LuaTeX? (for the
> platforms I have access to, i.e. mac intel, linux 32 & akira's windows
> b
On Jan 28, 2008 5:02 PM, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
> You need a very recent luatex from the SVN trunk (revision >= 979).
Should I update binaries to the latest SVN version of LuaTeX? (for the
platforms I have access to, i.e. mac intel, linux 32 & akira's windows
bin)
Mojca
__
On Jan 28, 2008, at 5:38 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> Jikes, I am afraid luatools is too new now: this needs the luatex
> trunk,
> not beta-0.20.0 :-(
>
Well, I can confirm that things work with a fresh svn checkout and the
latest current. Funny, Taco and Hans racing each other :-)
All best
Yue Wang wrote:
> LuaTools | running command: luatex --ini "--lua=cont-en.luc"
Jikes, I am afraid luatools is too new now: this needs the luatex trunk,
not beta-0.20.0 :-(
___
If your question is of interest to othe
On Jan 28, 2008 1:11 PM, Yue Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see the Jan 26 version of context so I just want to upgrade my system.
> As what I did before, go to http://minimals.contextgarden.net/ and
> download the file, unzip it and run.
> after rsync, it cannot generate the mkiv for
You need a very recent luatex from the SVN trunk (revision >= 979).
Arthur
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.
Yue Wang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see the Jan 26 version of context so I just want to upgrade my system.
> As what I did before, go to http://minimals.contextgarden.net/ and
> download the file, unzip it and run.
> after rsync, it cannot generate the mkiv format (other formats are fine)
> I run Debian
Yue Wang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see the Jan 26 version of context so I just want to upgrade my system.
> As what I did before, go to http://minimals.contextgarden.net/ and
> download the file, unzip it and run.
> after rsync, it cannot generate the mkiv format (other formats are fine)
> I run Debian
Hi,
I see the Jan 26 version of context so I just want to upgrade my system.
As what I did before, go to http://minimals.contextgarden.net/ and
download the file, unzip it and run.
after rsync, it cannot generate the mkiv format (other formats are fine)
I run Debian on x86 intel machine. I had d
14 matches
Mail list logo
