Re: [NTG-context] troubles with \MPinclusions (Taco Hoekwater)

2019-02-21 Thread Damien Thiriet
Thanks for your answers, I could significantly reduce my long timeline code. > 1. Variable names x and y are special and cleared before >every graphic. This is related to the fact that “z" is >defined as a shortcut for "(x,y)”. Both of these are >traditional. > >Every

Re: [NTG-context] troubles with \MPinclusions

2019-02-21 Thread Taco Hoekwater
> On 21 Feb 2019, at 10:03, Damien Thiriet wrote: > > Hi, > > > Why does (1) compile, whereas (2) doesn’t? For me, both compile. However (2) does not work. 1. Variable names x and y are special and cleared before every graphic. This is related to the fact that “z" is defined as a

Re: [NTG-context] troubles with \MPinclusions

2019-02-21 Thread Hans Hagen
On 2/21/2019 10:03 AM, Damien Thiriet wrote: Hi, Why does (1) compile, whereas (2) doesn't? I can't understand why can MPinclusions store path and not pairs. (1) %% \setuppapersize[A4,landscape] \startMPinclusions u:=1mm ; %fond path p ; p:= (0,0) --

[NTG-context] troubles with \MPinclusions

2019-02-21 Thread Damien Thiriet
Hi, Why does (1) compile, whereas (2) doesn't? I can't understand why can MPinclusions store path and not pairs. (1) %% \setuppapersize[A4,landscape] \startMPinclusions u:=1mm ; %fond path p ; p:= (0,0) -- (150u,0) -- (150u,95u) -- (0,95u) -- cycle ;