Re: [NTG-context] typesetting proofs
Dalyoung Jeong wrote: Dear all, Searching the lists, I found one and I got the output what I want as following image. But, as you noticed, there is a lot spaces between Theorem and the start of the text. Also there is the same space between Proof and the start of the text. Is it normal? or Is there any method to reduce the spaces? Thank you for reading. Dalyoung %Here is the definition following Mr. Taco's method \defineenumeration[Theorem] [location=serried, headstyle=bold, text=Theorem, number=yes, You probably want something like distance=4pt, Best, Taco ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] typesetting proofs
Dalyoung Jeong wrote: Dear all, Searching the lists, I found one and I got the output what I want as following image. But, as you noticed, there is a lot spaces between Theorem and the start of the text. Also there is the same space between Proof and the start of the text. Is it normal? or Is there any method to reduce the spaces? Thank you for reading. Dalyoung %Here is the definition following Mr. Taco's method \defineenumeration[Theorem] [location=serried, headstyle=bold, text=Theorem, number=yes, after=] \definestartstop[theorem] [before=\startTheorem, after=\stopTheorem] \defineenumeration[Proof] [location=serried, headstyle=slanted, text=Proof, number=no, after=] \definestartstop[proof] [before=\startProof, after=\hfil \stopProof] ... \startTheorem $P(n, r) = C(n,r) \stopTheorem \startProof An ordered arrangement... \stopProof you can use the width and distance keys to set the spacing - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
[NTG-context] typesetting proofs
Dear ConTeXt users,
i am trying to typeset correctly proofs in a document.
I tried to use the following definition :
\defineenumeration[preuve]
[location=serried,
headstyle=slanted,
text=Preuve,
number=no,
after={\hfil\QED}]
It's almost what i want, but there's a slight problem.
The command after executes itself after a newline, so,
the QED symbol is typeset at the line after the end of
the proof. What i'd like to have is the qed symbol at
the end of the last line of the proof. Any insight on
how i can do that?
Thanks
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] typesetting proofs
I've done similar things like this:
\defineenumeration[Preuve]
[location=serried,
headstyle=slanted,
text=Preuve,
number=no,
after=]
\definestartstop[preuve]
[before=\startPreuve,
after=\hfil\QED\stopPreuve]
Greetings, Taco
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear ConTeXt users,
i am trying to typeset correctly proofs in a document.
I tried to use the following definition :
\defineenumeration[preuve]
[location=serried,
headstyle=slanted,
text=Preuve,
number=no,
after={\hfil\QED}]
It's almost what i want, but there's a slight problem.
The command after executes itself after a newline, so,
the QED symbol is typeset at the line after the end of
the proof. What i'd like to have is the qed symbol at
the end of the last line of the proof. Any insight on
how i can do that?
Thanks
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
