Re: [NTG-context] weird behavior of font.feature.effect

2020-11-08 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Sylvain Hubert schrieb am 08.11.2020 um 13:02: On Sun, 8 Nov 2020 at 11:24, Pablo Rodriguez > wrote: Hi Sylvain, this is the same as:   \definefontfamily[face1][rm][gabriola] Just in case, "slanted" is an already defined feature. It slants the font.

Re: [NTG-context] weird behavior of font.feature.effect

2020-11-08 Thread Sylvain Hubert
On Sun, 8 Nov 2020 at 11:24, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: > Hi Sylvain, > > this is the same as: > > \definefontfamily[face1][rm][gabriola] > > Just in case, "slanted" is an already defined feature. It slants the font. > > > \definefontfamily[face2][rm][gabriola][it={features:{default, > > effect

Re: [NTG-context] weird behavior of font.feature.effect

2020-11-08 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
On 11/8/20 12:57 AM, Sylvain Hubert wrote: > Dear List, > > I'm confused by the result of the following example (see attached): > >     \definefontfamily[face1][rm][gabriola][it={features:{default}}] Hi Sylvain, this is the same as: \definefontfamily[face1][rm][gabriola] Just in case, "slante

[NTG-context] weird behavior of font.feature.effect

2020-11-07 Thread Sylvain Hubert
Dear List, I'm confused by the result of the following example (see attached): \definefontfamily[face1][rm][gabriola][it={features:{default}}] \definefontfamily[face2][rm][gabriola][it={features:{default, effect={}}}] \definefontfamily[face3][rm][gabriola][it={features:{default, effec