On 2/10/2016 3:38 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 02/10/2016 01:51 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 2/10/2016 12:19 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
[...]
Sorry for sounding impatient, but since next beta may take longer to be
released (because of columnsets), would it be possible to have a patch
to use
On 02/10/2016 01:51 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 2/10/2016 12:19 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>> [...]
>> Sorry for sounding impatient, but since next beta may take longer to be
>> released (because of columnsets), would it be possible to have a patch
>> to use latest released beta?
>
> patch
On 02/09/2016 06:02 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 2/9/2016 11:36 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>> [...]
>> Output with latest beta:
>>
>> Link: http://a.b/c\Ux {23}d
>>
>> Output with beta from 2016.01.14 09:55;
>>
>> Link: http://a.b/c#d
>>
>> I guess this is a bug. Could anyone else confirm
On 2/10/2016 12:19 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 02/09/2016 06:02 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 2/9/2016 11:36 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
[...]
Output with latest beta:
Link: http://a.b/c\Ux {23}d
Output with beta from 2016.01.14 09:55;
Link: http://a.b/c#d
I guess this is a bug.
Dear list,
I’m afraid there may be a bug in betas from February (including the
latest one from 2016.02.08 15:35):
\startbuffer[demo]
Link: http://a.b/c#d;>http://a.b/c#d
\stopbuffer
\starttext
\startxmlsetups xml:initialize
On 2/9/2016 11:36 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
Dear list,
I’m afraid there may be a bug in betas from February (including the
latest one from 2016.02.08 15:35):
\startbuffer[demo]
Link: http://a.b/c#d;>http://a.b/c#d
\stopbuffer
\starttext
